<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:27:33 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>07/05</title><subtitle>07/05</subtitle><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/atom.xml"/><updated>2005-09-08T17:04:11Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Thursday Reads</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/thursday-reads.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/thursday-reads.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2006-02-03T18:03:27Z</published><updated>2006-02-03T18:03:27Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p> Jerry Potter <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/golf/2005-07-19-wie-amateur-finances_x.htm">in the USA Today wonders how the Wie's are able to afford their summer of travel and golf.</a> Lots of fun spin from the characters quoted. The Golf Channel's George White <a href="http://www.thegolfchannel.com/core.aspx?page=15100&dv=4234963&select=16982&select2=0">explains that all the fuss about Tiger's swing change ignores the likely reason:</a> he did it to take pressure off of his bum knee. </p> <p> Douglas Lowe <a href="http://www.theherald.co.uk/sport/43451.html">reports that Tom Watson may have played his last Masters because of the recent course lengthening.</a> Watson also talks about Aberdeen's setup and design. <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/features/index.ssf?/features/gd200508allamjenkins.html">In a vintage Dan Jenkins piece for Golf Digest,</a> he looks at what America has given golf. </p> <p> Jim Seimas <a href="http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2005/July/18/sport/stories/02sport.htm">reports on the various forms of trickery they're going to inject into Harding Park</a> so that the World Championship event seems like a major. Sandy Tatum gurantees the rough will be harvested in time. Can't wait. And finally, <a href="http://www.sportinglife.com/golf/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=golf/05/07/20/GOLF_Hamburg_Nightlead.html">John Daly reveals that he has Ryder Cup aspirations. </a>Apparently no one told Daly he would have to wear a jacket and tie to mandatory functions!? </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>R&amp;A=Rough and Apathetic</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/rarough-and-apathetic.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/rarough-and-apathetic.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-09-08T17:02:35Z</published><updated>2005-09-08T17:02:35Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/geoff/geoff_standrews_rough.html"> Golfobserver.com column </a> on the addition of rough at St. Andrews is now posted.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Caddying In Depth</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/caddying-in-depth.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/caddying-in-depth.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-23T17:03:51Z</published><updated>2005-07-23T17:03:51Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p> Rich Kogan <a href="http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/golf/cs-0507170510jul17,1,3389306.story?coll=cs-golf-print">in the Chicago Tribune (reg. to a Tribune owned paper req.) files an epic feature</a> on caddying, with some great anecdotes and a neat famous former caddies list. Email this one to the misers who say caddying has no longer has a place in the game. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Wednesday Reads</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/wednesday-reads.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/wednesday-reads.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-20T17:03:01Z</published><updated>2005-07-20T17:03:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p> Oh to be a subscriber. Received my June 25 Golfweek in the mail today. Can&rsquo;t wait to catch up on the U.S. Open! And I'm getting SI Golf Plus again after the computer decided to switch me over to the Adventure section. You know how I love the X Games. Who said the Internet will never replace print? </p> <p> The Walker Cup squad <a href="http://www.thegolfchannel.com/core.aspx?page=15100&select=16983">was announced</a>, which is a reminder that we&rsquo;re just three weeks away from getting to see Chicago Golf Club. Michael Putnam becomes the second Pepperdine player to make it. I know you&rsquo;re excited. The big news is that Captain Bob Lewis selected no grumpy mid-Amateurs! </p> <p> Ran Morrissett&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.golfclubatlas.com/royalaberdeen000143.html">course profile should get you in the mood for the Senior British Open at </a><a href="http://www.golfclubatlas.com/royalaberdeen000143.html">Aberd</a>een. PGATOUR.com notes t<a href="http://www.pgatour.com/story/8658736">hat Greg Norman will be making his Champions Tour debut there</a>. </p> <p> Mark Soltau <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/britishopen/index.ssf?/majors/britishopen/20050717soltau.html">has some more comments from Tiger about the final round, and refers to Hank Haney as his swing coach</a>. I think it's safe to say we no longer have to hear references to Haney as Tiger's &quot;friend.&quot; <a href="http://www.thegolfchannel.com/core.aspx?page=15100&select=16985">There&rsquo;s also an AP story on how Hank Haney has been validated. </a> </p> <p> Golfweek's Martin Kaufman <a href="http://www.golfweek.com/ourtake/283798255989248.php">isn't very high on the TNT telecasts</a> and makes some good points, while <a href="http://www.golfweek.com/ourtake/300530414191997.php">Brad Klein plays yang to Kaufman's yin and says he enjoyed it despite the flaws</a>, because after all it was the Old Course. So they're both right! Golfobserver's &quot;Man from London&quot; <a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/manfromlondon_standrews.html">shares his Open thoughts.</a> </p> <p> The 2007 (and beyond) PGA Tour schedule <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/07/19/sports/s123318D83.DTL">is shaping up.</a> Sounds like some big events might move to the fall while an official post season swing is relegated to The Golf Channel. <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/newsandtour/index.ssf?/newsandtour/gw20050715huggan.html">And finally, don't miss John Huggan's excellent profile of Peter Thomson</a> in Golf World. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dawson: Players hitting ball further not true</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/dawson-players-hitting-ball-further-not-true.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/dawson-players-hitting-ball-further-not-true.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-19T17:02:08Z</published><updated>2005-07-19T17:02:08Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://sport.guardian.co.uk/golf/comment/0,10070,1531457,00.html">Lawrence Donegan in The Guardian and others write about the R&amp;A's post Open press conference.</a> Besides announcing that the 2010 Open will be at St. Andrews and the course will not change between now and then, Royal and Ancient Club have been collecting data (but they refuse to use the PGA Tour's revealing ShotLink). They believe there won't be any more distance gains. </p> <p> &quot;We and the United States Golf Association wanted a line drawn in the sand and hitting distances have plateaued,&quot; Dawson said. &quot;This is definitely happening - all this discussion that players are hitting the ball further is not true.&quot; </p> <p> Not true they are hitting further? Compared to when? Round 3 versus round 4? </p> <p> The Open driving distance average for those making the cut was 27 yards longer in 2005 than it was in 2004! Did he not hear that all but three players averaged OVER 300 yards off the tee? </p> <p> Donegan writes of the added length, rough and other setup ploys: &quot;all these 'innovations' may have kept the scoring higher but they fundamentally changed the character of the Old Course. Nothing is more likely to send the lay person to sleep than endless musing on the minutiae of course architecture, but behind the wearisome chitchat there is a big, big story: the Old Course is at its limit, and so is golf itself, because advances in technology - the ball, in particular - now mean the era of the 400-yard drive off the tee is upon us.&quot; </p> <p> Mike Aitken <a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1647962005">reports on the same press conference</a> and includes this rationalization from Dawson on the 17th hole setup, which Dawson admitted they may have misjudged: &quot;In retrospect, what we did there was perhaps not the smartest thing, though I think it would be a wrong analysis to surmise that was the reason people stopped using driver,&quot; he said. </p> <p> Really? You have a fairway basically ending with a rough checkpoint at the 315-yard point. That&rsquo;s the average tee shot length of the field, but the rough did not impact their decision-making? I wonder if he even blushes when making these claims? </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Open Wrap Up Vol. 2</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-wrap-up-vol-2.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-wrap-up-vol-2.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-19T17:01:23Z</published><updated>2005-07-19T17:01:23Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>So many great post-Open reads. But these were my favorites: Red Hoggard writes about<a href="http://www.golfweek.com/ourtake/299579244254917.php"> the humorous Open Championship Radio One coverage </a>. Bob Ryan <a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/golf/articles/2005/07/18/new_tiger_catches_up/"> on Old Tiger vs. New Tiger </a>. Dave Anderson in the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/18/sports/golf/18anderson.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1121704577-gAoEn8LYLlVFnQpzGUE49w"> says Jones vs. Tiger is like comparing apples to apples </a>. Here's <a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/artspander/ci_2867828"> the great Art Spander on Tiger </a>. And here's<a href="http://www.asapsports.com/golf2/2005british/071705TW.html"> Tiger on Tiger. </a> </p> <p> Doug Ferguson <a href="http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/sports/golf/12162185.htm">talks to Jack Nicklaus about Tiger&rsquo;s performance</a> and even the normally reserved Jack is in awe. This AP story <a href="http://golf.tbo.com/golf/MGBDLD81ABE.html">notes a equipment malfunction for Tiger prior to the Open</a>. And Mark Kiszla <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/golf/ci_2867243">in the Denver Post says the Old Course has been rendered obsolete</a>. Unfortunately, he says the cure is to drop it from the rotation, not address the equipment. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Open Wrap Up Vol. 1</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-wrap-up-vol-1.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-wrap-up-vol-1.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-18T17:00:53Z</published><updated>2005-07-18T17:00:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great to see that BBC has really moved into the 21st century with its camera work. Maybe they'll capture player reactions in the next century? Sheesh. Well, at least they had the crane on 17 to remind us how silly that fairway/walkway looked. </p> <p> As far as game stories on Tiger and a wonderful week, <a href="http://sport.guardian.co.uk/open2005/story/0,16115,1530772,00.html">here's the link to Lawrence Donegan's in The Guardian.</a> Here's <a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1643832005">Mike Aitken's Scotsman story</a> on the various contenders and Tiger. Oh, and not to be forgotten, <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8609216/">here's the story on Jason Gore's second win in a row.</a> Back to the Open, Peter McCleery <a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/mccleery/mccleery_British_show.html">reviews the TBS and ABC telecasts,</a> with several interesting observations. Though he kindly chose not to comment on the BBC's wretched camera work and overall coverage, which ABC is at the mercy of. Michael Hiestand <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/columnist/hiestand-tv/2005-07-17-hiestand-abc_x.htm">in the USA Today also offers a review.</a> He's no Rudy Martzke, which means he&rsquo;s enjoyable to read. Tod Leonard <a href="http://signonsandiego.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=SignOnSanDiego.com+%3E+Sports+--+Is+this+any+way+to+end%3F&expire=&urlID=14865732&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.signonsandiego.com%2Fsports%2Fgolf%2F20050717-9999-1s17britside.html&partnerID=628">has some interesting stats on how easy 18 played through Saturday.</a> </p> <p> <br /> For complete stats, <a href="http://www.unisys.com/eprise/main/admin/corporate/doc/about_unisys/sports/2000_OpenChampionship.pdf">here's a link to the 2000 Open stat package,</a> and <a href="http://www.unisys.com/eprise/main/admin/corporate/doc/about_unisys/sports/2005_OpenChampionship.pdf">the 2005 Unisys breakdown.</a> This will be scrutinized more this week, but there's some wild stuff in the numbers. My early favorite: 10 players making the cut averaged over 300 in 2000. All but 3 players making the cut in 2005 averaged OVER 300 yards! Man, these Tour guys must be reading Arnold Schwartzenegger's fitness editorials!<br /> </p> <p> Gary Van Sickle <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/gary_van_sickle/07/15/john.daly/index.html">explains why John Daly skipped the champions dinner.</a> <a href="http://sport.guardian.co.uk/open2005/story/0,16115,1530730,00.html">This unbylined Guardian story rev</a>eals some frustration with Tiger for not signing autographs after an early round, and the uproar it caused in Britain. I'm sure Tiger will lose a lot of sleep over it. John Huggan <a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1641132005">wrote on Sunday (prior to the finale) about Tiger's putting woes</a>. Finally, Tom Mackin <a href="http://www.golfonline.com/golfonline/tours/britishopen/article/0,17742,1083947,00.html">paints a picture of what was going on outside the ropes Sunday</a>. </p><p><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Technology and St. Andrews</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/technology-and-st-andrews.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/technology-and-st-andrews.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-18T16:54:40Z</published><updated>2005-07-18T16:54:40Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.theherald.co.uk/sport/43228.html">Douglas Lowe, who if I'm not mistaken, has written some what's all the fuss about pieces,</a> says technology needs to be reined in. </p> <p> Peter Dawson, the chief executive, has warned that if it became necessary to lengthen the Old Course again it would be time instead to rein in the ball. The significance of the driving distance figures from St Andrews this week is that the time is well nigh if, indeed, it hasn't passed already. </p> <p> Tim Glover <a href="http://sport.independent.co.uk/golf/article299931.ece">in the Independent also says Tigerproofing is a waste of time</a>. </p> <p> Even so, the Beardies are still as old-fashioned as a moustache. The governing bodies are looking at the problem from the wrong angle. They can make a course as long as they like, but it will not outstrip modern technology. They keep tinkering with the real estate instead of the real issue. </p><p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Clueless</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/clueless.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/clueless.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-17T16:54:12Z</published><updated>2005-07-17T16:54:12Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1640712005">John Huggan writes about the rough on 17 for his Sunday column. </a> Naturally, Peter Dawson says something ridiculous. Though even for the R&amp;A executive secretary, this is a new low: </p> <p> In retrospect, I have to agree that the rough on the right of the 17th isn't ideal. If we had to do it over again, I don't think we'd let it grow there. But it's too late to do anything now. On the other hand, by not allowing a player to drive a long way up the right side, we have ensured that everyone will be hitting a longer approach shot. That has to be a good thing. </p> <p> Hey, why not just eliminate the tee shot all together and create a big white circle where you'd like them to approach from. That way you ensure everyone will be hitting a longer approach, and you don't have to do anything about the ball! Yeah, that's a good thing. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Open Sunday Reads</title><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-sunday-reads.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/0705/2005/9/8/open-sunday-reads.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2005-07-17T16:53:42Z</published><updated>2005-07-17T16:53:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Wow, only one more day of those wonderful ING ads. I'm getting sad just thinking about it. <a href="http://www.canada.com/sports/golf/story.html?id=d7ce0b1a-cfdb-4739-8bc7-4c76561699d1"> If you want to get mad, read about Michael Campbell ripping the finishing hole at St. Andrews because it's too short. </a> Yes, it's the hole's fault that you guys are cheating, I mean, optimizing launch conditions. Jim Achenbach <a href="http://www.golfweek.com/ourtake/283773405329843.php"> sits in the grandstand on 7 and 11 greens, </a> and reflects on spectating at the majors. But he says this is the best spectating spot of all. </p> <p> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?"> David Davies has a note on technology, wedges and a juicy quote from Will Nicholson </a>. Sounds like Will is in St. Andrews doing a little groundwork prep on the Masters ball! And finally, thanks to TBS for sending the press release that included this highlight quote from Bobby Clampett during Saturday's telecast. Here's Bobby on the difference between the modern player and players in the past: &ldquo;I think there&rsquo;s more emphasis today on style and technique, as opposed to dynamics. Players like (Greg) Norman may have had interesting techniques, but had great dynamics.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> And if you know what that means, you are one bright soul on this Open Sunday.<br /> <br /> </p>]]></content></entry></feed>