<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:34:18 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>01/05</title><subtitle>01/05</subtitle><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/atom.xml"/><updated>2005-08-14T18:59:22Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Apocalypse Now: Trump Edition</title><category term="Architecture"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/apocalypse-now-trump-edition.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/apocalypse-now-trump-edition.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-31T19:56:54Z</published><updated>2004-12-31T19:56:54Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.golfonline.com/golfonline/features/features/article/0,17742,1012382,00.html">In his final contribution to Golf Magazine</a>, former editor Kevin Cook interviews the ubiquitous Donald Trump. And it's all about money.<br>
<br>
  <p> “The state's spending $400 million on a highway (Widening and
improving interstate 95), but didn't build me an exit, and I put up
quite a fuss about that. They ended up building a $30 million exit
(Florida Department of Transportation says the exit cost even more, $40
million) that goes to my $45 million course.” </p> <p> Other gems: </p> <p>
Q: You love water features. The signature hole at your Westchester
course is a par 3 with a 100-foot waterfall. What do you say to people
who call it a big gimmick?</p>
<p> A: I say they're people who can't afford to build a $7 million waterfall. </p>
 <p> Q: How's your relationship with Tom Fazio, who built your course in Bedminster? </p> <p> A:
He had already designed a wonderful course there before I bought it. My
organization made it bigger, better, more beautiful. There's a new lake
on the fourth hole and another one on the 11th--I wanted those there.
They had 1,200 sprinklers before. Now we have more than 2,000. Tom
Fazio is a great architect, and I'm a pretty good golfer who
understands the game. We have a great relationship. He tells me, "You
know, Donald, I have owners who'll send their G5 to pick me up and fly
me to Texas or California to plant a small tree. But Donald, you don't
call me--I just get here and there's more lakes than we planned on!<br>
<br>
 </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Lamenting…</title><category term="PGA Tour"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/lamenting.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/lamenting.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-27T19:56:11Z</published><updated>2004-12-27T19:56:11Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>John Huggan <a href="http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/othersport.cfm?id=1465362004">laments the state of golf in Scotland</a>, while the AP's Doug Ferguson <a href="http://www.pga.com/news/tours/pga-tour/thrill122504.cfm">says the buzz surrounding the PGA Tour’s World Championship events is go</a>ne.<br>
<br>
  <p> I didn’t know there ever was any buzz. Well don’t worry,
Commissioner Finchem is on top of the situation. He says they need to
go to better cities and courses. So guess where he can’t wait to
return? Bellerive. That thrilling RTJ Sr. course that had legions
tuning for the 2004 U.S. Senior Open. Goose bumps here just typing
about it. </p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Garl: Embracing Technology</title><category term="Technology and Golf"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/garl-embracing-technology.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/garl-embracing-technology.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-24T19:55:23Z</published><updated>2004-12-24T19:55:23Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[  <p> Architect Ron Garl <a href="http://www.worldgolf.com/features/ron-garl-column1-929.htm">notes that the game isn’t growing despite recent technological advances. So what does he say we should do?</a> </p> <p>
“I say, embrace it! If the new technology keeps people playing the
game, as golf course architects, we should keep the challenge alive.” </p> <p> Okay. And how do they do it? Some people want to protect the sanctity of marriage, some have other things in mind.<br> </p> <p> “My goal is to protect the sanctity of the second shot.” </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Duncan 's Wish List</title><category term="Architecture"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/duncan-s-wish-list.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/duncan-s-wish-list.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-23T19:54:09Z</published><updated>2004-12-23T19:54:09Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[ <p> Travelgolf.com's Derek Duncan <a href="http://www.travelgolf.com/departments/clubhouse/architect-wish-list-923.htm">offers a stellar year end architecture wish list.</a> </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Shotlink Summary</title><category term="PGA Tour"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/shotlink-summary.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/shotlink-summary.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-23T19:53:41Z</published><updated>2004-12-23T19:53:41Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[  <p> The always interesting Steve Elling of the Orlando Sentinel <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/golf/orl-sptshotlink22122204dec22,1,27749.story?coll=orl-sports-headlines-golf">looks at Shotlink and the data it is producing. </a>Included
are quotes from Steve Flesch on the year end packets given to players
telling them far more than they ever wanted to know. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Did Driver Testing Work?</title><category term="Technology and Golf"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/did-driver-testing-work.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/did-driver-testing-work.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-20T19:52:39Z</published><updated>2004-12-20T19:52:39Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/newsandtour/index.ssf?/newsandtour/gw20041217sirak.html">final Golf World of 2004, Ron Sirak writes</a>,
“Although there is absolutely no way of knowing whether it was a result
of driver testing - just as there is no way to verify if Barry Bonds
knowingly took steroids unless he says so - there was a curious drop in
driving distance by big boppers from 2003 to 2004.”<br>
  <p> Sirak writes that while the Tour driving distance average went up
one yard in 2004, there was a noticeable fall off in the top 10 this
season. Was it the driver testing ridding the Tour of illegal drivers?
Or if the athleticism theory holds, did the top 10 just go to the gym a
little less often?<br>
<br> On this topic, <i>Sports Illustrated</i> recently published faux
emails between writers Chris Lewis and Jim Gorant, where they revealed
attempts to get the actual number of drivers tested (and those ruled
illegal), resulted in a response seemingly straight out of All The
President’s Men, with the Tour official making contradictory claims and
fudging numbers clearly after some form of internal discussion.
Ultimately, SI could not get a straight answer on the subject. </p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Vijay Roundtable…</title><category term="PGA Tour"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/vijay-roundtable.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/vijay-roundtable.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-18T19:51:36Z</published><updated>2004-12-18T19:51:36Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>After watching a reporter shed a fake tear in Broadcast News,
sweat-prone reporter Aaron Altman reminded the newsroom, “Let's never
forget, we're the real story, not them.”<br>
<br>
<p> Only if you’ve had several glasses of a strong merlot would I recommend reading <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/newsandtour/index.ssf?/newsandtour/gw20041217vijayroundtable.html">this 3,500 word Golf World round table</a> on Vijay Singh. The key exchange to remind us who the real story is all about? <br> </p> 
<ul>
  <li> GW: Is Singh's problem specific to the media or is it a broader issue? </li>
  <li> Sheeley: Some of it is shyness, some of it pertains to the
cultural differences Jaime spoke of, and some of it lingers from the
[scorecard] episode--I think he feels it's in everybody's mind all the
time. </li>
  <li> Hawkins: I'm not sure Singh, being from Fiji, understands the
tenets of American journalism--the freedom of the press as defined by
the U.S. Constitution. </li>
  <li> Diaz: I agree. </li>
  <li> Hawkins: We're talking about a guy who didn't grow up in a
culture where democracy and objectivity were crucial to the balance of
society. </li>
  <li> Other important issues addressed: <br>
 GW: Does Vijay have close friends on tour? </li>
  <li> GW: Is there anything Vijay likes to do besides play golf? I
know Tim asked him the question 11 years ago. Have you guys come up
with an answer? </li>
  <li> GW: What kind of food does he serve at his party? </li>
  <li> GW: If you got on the same elevator as Singh and were both
taking it to the 50th floor, what would you say to him on the ride up? </li>
</ul>
        </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Golfdom Year In Review/Column</title><category term="Architecture"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/golfdom-year-in-reviewcolumn.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/golfdom-year-in-reviewcolumn.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-17T19:50:47Z</published><updated>2004-12-17T19:50:47Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.golfdom.com/">Golfdom.com</a> has posted <a href="http://www.golfdom.com/golfdom/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=136210">my year end review story</a> and <a href="http://www.golfdom.com/golfdom/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=136214">column on the role of local knowledge in the game</a> as it relates to the rangefinder issue. ]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Next Trend?</title><category term="Architecture"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/the-next-trend.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/the-next-trend.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-16T19:50:06Z</published><updated>2004-12-16T19:50:06Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>First you had to have a player-architect. <a href="http://www.cybergolf.com/index.asp?newsID=2560">Now two for one course?</a><p> </p> <p>
“Two of golf’s greatest golfers are teaming up to create a world-class
layout at Waterberg, one of the fastest-growing areas in South Africa,”
says a press release touting a new Ernie Els-Jack Nicklaus design in
South Africa. </p> <p> The duo was brought together by the “lure of
big game and a love for championship golf .” Yes, the course will be
playing through a big game preserve. <br> <br> “Occupying over 6,900
acres of bushveld, Waterberg boasts an abundance of water in a
malaria-free area. Residents will be able to view almost all of the
major species of game on the property, including four of the Big 5.” </p> <p> What does that mean? Well, at least it's good to know that the Waterberg is malaria-free. </p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Ball of the future (and what a bargain!)</title><category term="Technology and Golf"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/ball-of-the-future-and-what-a-bargain.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/ball-of-the-future-and-what-a-bargain.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-15T19:48:42Z</published><updated>2004-12-15T19:48:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>First there was the much ballyhooed announcement about the
“revolutionary” new NanoDynamics golf ball “whose rotational speed is
reduced, the potential for hooking and slicing is diminished.”<br>
<br>
  <p> "In addition to straighter drives, the NDMX technology is
expected to improve roll characteristics of the ball on the green
resulting in truer putts.” Is expected? </p> <p> As “an extra benefit,
the core of the NDMX golf ball is completely recyclable.” Oh great. I'm
sure golfers across the land will peel off the cover and drop the core
in their neighborhood recycling bins. </p> <p> <a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20041214005564&amp;newsLang=en">Now comes the news that the company has signed up former USGA Technical Director Frank Thomas</a> to get him to proclaim this to be the greatest product ever. </p> <p>
"I look forward to working with NanoDynamics on the NDMX concept, which
has the potential to revolutionize and revitalize the golf ball
industry," Thomas said. "The NDMX technology will provide a more
efficient projectile for a wide range of golfer skill levels and I
believe it will enhance the game of golf." </p> <p> This is quite an
about face for one of the leading voices against over-commercialization
of the sport. Why? How about the price for this revolutionary ball.
Seated? </p> <p> <a href="http://yourcompanyshop.com/ndmxgolf/catalog/default.aspx?lid=121">They’re taking pre-orders for sleeves</a> starting at just $24.99. A dozen balls will set you back $89.99. But don’t forget, those cores are recyclable! </p> <p> Yep, herein lies golf’s salvation. </p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>PGA Tour's Toughest Holes/Courses</title><category term="PGA Tour"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/pga-tours-toughest-holescourses.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/pga-tours-toughest-holescourses.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-14T19:47:46Z</published><updated>2004-12-14T19:47:46Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[ <p>The PGA Tour released <a href="http://www.pgatour.com/story/7877927">its annual list of the toughest holes on the Tour. </a>Not much in the way of interesting architecture in this 18-hole set. And <a href="http://www.golfweb.com/story/7877697">they feature the 2004 ranking of courses</a> from toughest to easiest. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Book Reviews</title><category term="Books"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/book-reviews.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/book-reviews.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-14T19:47:18Z</published><updated>2004-12-14T19:47:18Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[ <p>The Scotsman's John Huggan <a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1420242004">reviews the new Faldo and Alliss biographies,</a> as well as a series of new golf course guides written by Greg Turner that sound quite interesting. And my <a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/geoff_ChristmasBooks.html">Golfobserver.com column reviewing various 2004 books</a> is now posted. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>USGA.org Has A Pulse…Barely</title><category term="USGA"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/usgaorg-has-a-pulsebarely.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/usgaorg-has-a-pulsebarely.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-10T19:46:49Z</published><updated>2004-12-10T19:46:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[  <p> The new and unimproved <a href="http://www.usga.org/">USGA.org</a> isn’t exactly a must visit web site even though it was supposed to replace <i>Golf Journal</i> as a source for stories and other golf information. For December, <a href="http://www.usga.org/news/2004/december/nitrogen.html">the site offers a David Shefter story</a>
on noble efforts by Long Island superintendents to pursue
environmentally friendly maintenance programs. Granted, the LA Times
ran a more comprehensive story and didn’t do it in USGA.org's
unreadable gray font, but at least the USGA is offering some content. </p> <p> Other site is news: <a href="http://www.usga.org/news/2004/december/2004_78.html">NBC will air the USGA year in review</a>
this Sunday, December 12, at 1 p.m. Eastern (is there any other time
zone?). If nothing else, it’s worth watching to see how NBC handles the
Shinnecock Hills fiasco. And will David Fay find a way to get in a plug
for his favorite rangefinders to get dad for Christmas. After all, they
are golf's $300 slow play remedy. </p> <p> Finally, <a href="http://www.usga.org/news/2004/november/2004_74.html">the submittal deadline for the annual USGA Book Drive</a>, err, Book Award, is January 15, 2005. Shockingly, <i>The Future of Golf in America </i>will not be nominated this year. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Golf Digest Best New 2004</title><category term="Rankings"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/golf-digest-best-new-2004.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/golf-digest-best-new-2004.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-09T19:46:19Z</published><updated>2004-12-09T19:46:19Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/bestnew/">magazine's annual listing</a>
of best new and worst named golf courses is now online. Some real name
doozies this year: Circling Raven, The Bull at Pinehurst Farms, Lake
Winnipesaukee, Dale Hollow Lake State Resort Park and Sleepy Hole. Yes,
Sleepy Hole. </p> <p> Ron Whitten writes that <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/bestnew/index.ssf?/courses/bestnew/gd200501bestaffordable.html">the best new affordable</a>, Copper Mill, features a "satanic" routing. The <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/bestnew/index.ssf?/courses/bestnew/gd200501bestprivate.html">best new private is Sutton Bay</a>, the <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/bestnew/index.ssf?/courses/bestnew/gd200501bestupscalepublic.html">best new upscale public</a> is The Quarry at Giants Ridge and <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/bestnew/index.ssf?/courses/bestnew/gd200501bestcanadian.html">best new Canadian</a> is The Rock. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Aussie Players Bite Back...Not Really</title><category term="State of the Game"/><id>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/aussie-players-bite-backnot-really.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0105/2005/8/14/aussie-players-bite-backnot-really.html"/><author><name>Geoff</name></author><published>2004-12-09T19:45:26Z</published><updated>2004-12-09T19:45:26Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[  <p> In response to the news of horrible ratings and implications that pro golfers are <a href="http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11624516%255E11088,00.html">boring and self centered</a>, the Herald Sun <a href="http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11633300%255E11088,00.html">followed up with player feedback on the article.</a><br> </p> <p>
"I know where they are coming from," Adam Scott said of the Aussie TV
executives. "Sometimes I'm bored watching golf on television, no
question about it." <br>
</p> Of course, if the players were forced to make interesting
decisions by playing compelling courses, this might just produce plenty
of emotion and drama. But with today's equipment on yesterday's
courses, the drama just isn't going to happen very often.]]></content></entry></feed>