<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:26:31 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Masters05</title><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright>(C) 2005 Geoff Shackelford</copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>One More Masters Read</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:54:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/one-more-masters-read.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241816</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Reader Tim  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44967-2005Apr11.html"> noticed this excellent Sally Jenkins column in the Washington Post (reg. required).<strong> </strong></a> </p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241816.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Hootie The Prophet</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:53:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/hootie-the-prophet.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241814</guid><description><![CDATA[<p> Now posted  <a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/geoff/geoff_masters_hootie.html"> is my Golfobserver.com column complimenting </a> Hootie Johnson on (some) of his foresight and wisdom. Oh, and in the &quot;let's get Hootie signed up for Shotlink department&quot;: reader Josh noticed that Tiger's long drive for the week (and seemingly every other player's) came on the fourteenth hole. Tiger's longest is listed as 315 yards. Considering he had at least two in the 375 range that we saw on live TV (#2 Sat., #1 Sunday), plus at least 10 more during televised coverage that pushed the 320 range, I'd say it's time for Hootie Johnson to bring ShotLink to Augusta. On second thought, if it leads to more tree planting....maybe not.  </p> <p> Seth Davis of SI has an excellent report on his day following Tiger from start to finish. The m  <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/seth_davis/04/11/mastes.gallery/index.html"> ost hilarious (or disturbing?) note came from his time in the press lookout tower on 18 </a> .  </p> <p> &ldquo;Even though I was surrounded by several dozen of the most dedicated golf writers in the world, nobody could say for sure where the playoff was going to take place. Just when I was wondering how I was going to beat the crowd to the 10th hole, I hear that the playoff will actually begin on the 18th. What luck!&rdquo; </p> <p> Rudy Martzke  <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/columnist/martzke/2005-04-10-martzke_x.htm"> in the USA Today explains why CBS couldn&rsquo;t show coverage on USA during the weekend mornings </a> , then pretty much writes about the brilliant job the CBS announce team did. He must have flipped over to a baseball game when Verne Lundquist went on about the vibrating 6th green or when no one at CBS seemed to know what was being said between Chris DiMarco and Masters officials on the eighth hole. And then there were the times Bobby Clampett opened his mouth...still, they have Feherty and Oosterhuis to save the day.  </p> <p> For a  <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/masters/index.ssf?/majors/masters/20050411mccleery.html"> superior CBS coverage review, check out Peter McCleery&rsquo;s piece on GolfDigest.com </a> . Not only does McCleery point out that NBC and the USGA added morning round completion coverage at Pebble Beach in 2000, but he also notices just how close (again) the Masters came to running out of sunlight Sunday evening.  </p> <p> I didn&rsquo;t see the coverage on this, but last week  <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/sports/articles/0407bickley0407.html"> Dan Bickley in the Arizona Republic looked at rumors of Mickelson's gambling addiction. </a> Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported that &ldquo;this week&rsquo;s most outrageous rumor for the caddie clique,&quot; said Mickelson switched from Titleist to Callaway &ldquo;because he has run up considerable gambling debts.&rdquo;  </p> <p> Which led to this  <a href="http://www.jimrome.com/home/article/article_2.html"> comment from radio talk show host Jim Rome </a> : &quot;Callaway officials angrily deny this saying they did an intensive background check on Mickelson&rsquo;s gambling history. Look, the fact that Callaway felt it necessary to do an intensive background check or that Mickelson even has a gambling history to speak of, tells you something right there. Look, it&rsquo;s always dicey to comment on rumor and innuendo, but where there&rsquo;s smoke, there&rsquo;s fire and there&rsquo;s an awful lot of gambling smoke coming off of Phil Mickelson right now.&quot;<strong> </strong> </p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241814.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Did You Notice...Vol. 2…</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:53:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/did-you-noticevol-2.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241811</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&hellip;Tim Finchem grinning like never before during the closing ceremony? As he should be.<br /> <br />    <p> &hellip;That Bobby Clampett still calls the Hogan Bridge &ldquo;Hogan&rsquo;s Bridge,&rdquo; like it&rsquo;s an amusement park ride? </p>   <p> &hellip;The Golf Channel&rsquo;s flashback piece with Chris DiMarco from 1997? The man had a full fledged mullet! </p>   <p> &hellip;According to DiMarco, Tiger had 65 yards into #1? Thank you optimization. </p>   <p> &hellip;That Phil Mickelson tried to make Bill Macatee out to be the bad guy along with the rest of the media for making something of spike-gate? Uh, Phil, you were the one that issued a press release, otherwise it probably wouldn&rsquo;t have been a story.<strong> </strong></p> <p> </p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241811.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Masters Ball Vol. 3</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:52:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/masters-ball-vol-3.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241810</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/masters/index.ssf?/majors/masters/20050407topicb.html">Bob Carney of Golf Digest has an excellent summary</a> of the Masters ball talk and the various complications. To put this baby to bed now (well, for this week), the concept can be simple one. Tiger Woods offered a solution last year, but Hootie probably never read it since it went unreported. <br /> <br /> It is, however in the forthcoming edition of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1570614563/qid=1113188546/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/002-8027046-1084055?v=glance&s=books&n=507846">The Future of Golf</a> (subtle plug I know): &ldquo;I think you should put a limit on the speed of a golf ball, the spin rate of a golf ball. You can increase the spin of the golf ball and make it so that we don't hit the ball as far. You can decrease the speed of the core. There's different ways you can get around it so that we're all playing under certain speed limits. Hopefully that will be the answer to a lot of the problems that we're having with golf course design around the world.&rdquo; This prevents the bifurcation issue. The only complication is that it requires the USGA to admit it made mistakes. Since they are still struggling to admit Shinnecock went bad, don&rsquo;t count on it.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241810.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Tiger Laying Up On 17?</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/4/11/tiger-laying-up-on-17.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241809</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Not too many thrilling questions from the scribblers, but at least the bizarre situation on 17 came up. If you were listening closely, you heard Steve Williams tell Tiger he had 126 to the hole, and then said all he had to do was hit it 115 yards. Peter Oosterhuis didn&rsquo;t comment because like most of us, he probably thought he didn&rsquo;t hear the comment right. But it turns out, Tiger was laying up on this approach there. <a href="http://www.asapsports.com/golf2/2005masters/041005TW2.html">Here&rsquo;s the entire transcript link</a>:</p> <blockquote>   <p><strong> Q. I don't wish to sound negative, but what on earth happened on 17 and 18? </strong></p>   <p><strong> TIGER WOODS: I hit just a block on 17. What do you call it, the second shot, I got too conservative with it and tried to putt the ball short of the green and overdid it. I just had one of the worst lies you could possibly have for that shot. My ball mark was just behind my golf ball, so I could not make contact with the golf ball flush. </strong></p>   <strong> I thought about, you know, could I put the ball up there and leave it short right of the green, but, you know, just try, more than likely you're probably going to fat it and put it short of the green. Just make sure you don't blink it, and that's what happened. I hit it pretty decent but it was pretty fat because of the golf mark right behind my golf ball, spun up and made my putt.</strong></blockquote>   <p> </p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241809.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Misc. Masters Reads - Monday</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/misc-masters-reads-monday2.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241807</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span>  <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://www.asapsports.com/golf2/2005masters/041005CD.html">Here&rsquo;s Chris DiMarco&rsquo;s press conference transcr</a>ipt. Didn&rsquo;t get enough of spike gate? Golfonline&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.golfonline.com/golfonline/tours/masters/article/0,17742,1047311,00.html">Cameron Morfit has more</a>. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>   <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12816444-23213,00.html">This Fox Sports Australia story looks at Bernhard Langer's comments</a> on the Saturday tee-time debacle.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241807.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Verne and Vibration</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/verne-and-vibration.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241805</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">How about Verne Lundquist nearly screaming that Chris DiMarco's ball - momentarily perched on a sixth green ledge -&nbsp;was vibrated loose when Tiger's ball hit the ground? It was especially bizarre&nbsp;since a camera shot showed DiMarco's ball already down on the front fringe. Lanny Wadkins said it was &quot;tough to tell&quot; if the vibration set DiMarco's ball loose. Who said Lanny didn't have a kind heart? </span>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241805.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>While We Were Away...</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/4/11/while-we-were-away.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241803</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">...Tiger rolled off 7 straight birdies (well, four added on to yesterday's 3), DiMarco stumbled, and it's looking like it'll be #4 for Woods. He birdied 7-13! Wonder if he would have birdied 10 if he had to play yesterday's mud ball?&nbsp;But here's what I want to know: can we just follow the Phil-Vijay pairing with updates on Tiger?<br /> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Not many early Sunday reads, but still a few on ball manufacturers favorite subject. <a href="http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/myrtlebeachonline/sports/11358323.htm">Alan Blondin in the Myrtle Beach paper</a> has plenty of fun insights and a nice overview, with quotes from Dick Rugge, Bob Combs and Larry Dorman. Does the USGA seem to be positioning themselves to do something by pointing to the near completion of their three year study? <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/golf/cst-spt-ball10.html">Len Ziehm in the Chicago Sun Times</a> has some fascinating revelations about the Masters ball talk, including a tour Hootie and Jack took around the course, ending with Hootie asking, &quot;what are we going to do about the ball?&quot; And <a href="http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=377862005">John Huggan writes about the Masters</a> and talks with European Tour head George O'Grady.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241803.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Let The Sun Go Down Before You Call The Round</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:47:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/let-the-sun-go-down-before-you-call-the-round.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241801</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice Augusta&rsquo;s Billy Payne wearing sunglasses when play was called because of darkness? Strange sight watching them blow the horn (well no one at CBS seemed to hear it) as sunlight was hitting the trees. Tiger, naturally, couldn&rsquo;t wait to mark his muddy ball on 10, and <a href="http://www.asapsports.com/golf2/2005masters/040905TW.html#1">he wasn&rsquo;t shy about taking advantage of the situation</a>.&nbsp; <blockquote>   <p><strong> Q. Could you talk about the mud ball on 10 and if that made it an easy decision? </strong></p>   <p><strong> TIGER WOODS: Oh, it was a no-brainer. It was a great break that they blew the horn and they said it was going to either blow at 7:45 or whenever the last group finished 9, whatever happened first. When we saw that down there,it was nice to know I could put the tee in the ground. </strong></p>   <strong> Tiger also addressed the apparent tee-time boondoggle after the completion of the second round, which had players going to the wrong tee and going out with the wrong players and CBS totally confused.<br />   <br />  </strong>   <p><strong><a name="q3" /><a name="end2"> Q. There was some footage of you in between rounds lounging around. Were you getting antsy around waiting as long as you were?</a><a name="endq3"> </a></strong> </p>   <p><strong><a name="3"> TIGER WOODS: Well we didn't know what time we were going to go off. There were no tee times. They were calling guys to the tee. No one had a clue. </a> I don't know what happened, but I guess it was computer failure or something like that or no tee times were written. So guys were on the putting green going, &quot;What time do you play? I have no idea.&quot; So I'm standing around, putting around, so we don't have a clue. So I went on the range, warmed up, thought I had 55 minutes or so, according to the math we did if we're going eight-minute intervals because that's what it looked like starting out. All of a sudden, I had an hour and 15 minutes, so I had to shut it down and laid on the bag and rested. Thomas went over and did it and same thing with David.</strong> </p> </blockquote></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241801.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Did you notice…</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/did-you-notice.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241800</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> &hellip;Augusta&rsquo;s Billy Payne walking&nbsp;Tiger off the course Saturday and&nbsp;speaking into his secret service cuff link mike?&nbsp;These Augusta guys are too hi-tech for me.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">&hellip;Scott Verplank taking a nice big chunk out of the 12th green as Bobby Clampett chalked it up to his competitiveness? </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>   <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">&hellip;Tiger driving it 375 on #2 in the afternoon? Must be all that working out, and of course, modern agronomy. That ball must have rolled 10 yards!</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>   <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">&hellip;The number of spikemarks in Ben Crenshaw&rsquo;s line during the 1995 Masters flashback? Was Phil playing ahead of him?&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241800.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Misc. Masters Reads - Sunday</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/misc-masters-reads-sunday.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241799</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/masters/index.ssf?/majors/masters/20050409nicklaus.html">The AP story on Nicklaus's classy, understated fairwell</a>. And here's <a href="http://asapsports.com/golf2/2005masters/040905JN.html">Jack's press conference</a>. &quot;Unless I can gain ten-mile-an-hour more clubhead speed, then I'm not coming back; how is that? I don't think that's going to happen.&quot; Get this man on a launch monitor!</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span>  <h2 style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></h2>     <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Golf World's Michael Johnson <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/masters/index.ssf?/majors/masters/20050408cleat.html">with more on spat...err...spikegate</a>.<br /> <br /> GolfDigest.com <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/majors/masters/index.ssf?/majors/masters/20050409spike.html">compiles the best lines from columnists</a> writing about the Vijay-Phil spat. </span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241799.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>More Misc Masters Reads – Saturday</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:45:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/more-misc-masters-reads-saturday.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241798</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Scott Michaux <a href="http://www.augusta.com/masters/stories/040905/new_3851879.shtml">looks at the Vijay-Mickelson cat fight</a>, the Champions Locker Room scene and other &ldquo;gates&rdquo; in this week of controversy and little else (so far). No stories yet on what exactly it was that Vijay called himselfe after his less than idea tee shot on 13 Friday, but one TiVo viewer emailed in to say that after three viewings, it was definitely &ldquo;Fa!!#&amp;...Mother *&amp;$%!@.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </span>    <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Joe Gordon <a href="http://sports.bostonherald.com/golf/view.bg?articleid=77641">explains that the unusually late start to Friday&rsquo;s play</a> was caused by the club&rsquo;s desire to mow fairways, which hadn&rsquo;t been cut since Wednesday. And <a href="http://www.augusta.com/masters/stories/040905/cou_2840296.shtml">there&rsquo;s this wacky Augusta Chronicle story </a>about a rare piece of Sarazen memorabilia washing up in a nearby creek. </span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241798.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Q&amp;A with Dan Jenkins</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:45:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/qa-with-dan-jenkins.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241797</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">My </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://www.golfobserver.com/features/geoff/geoff_danjenkins.html"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">GolfObserver.com interview with Dan Jenkins</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> is now posted. </span>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241797.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Golf Digest Top 100</title><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:44:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/golf-digest-top-100.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241795</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Here&rsquo;s </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/courses/americasgreatest/"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">the introduction and top 50 of the Digest 100.</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> Here&rsquo;s </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/courses/americasgreatest/index.ssf?/courses/americasgreatest/gd200305100greatest.html"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">the 2003 list</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> so you can see what happens when they still had Tradition points (editorial tinkering) to save the panel from embarrassing itself. And this takes you to a </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/pdf/gd200505100greatestcourses.pdf"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">PDF of the Top 100</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">, while here&rsquo;s the PDF of the </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/pdf/gd200505100greatestpublic.pdf"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Top 100 public list</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> (viewer discretion is advised). There&rsquo;s a link to </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/pdf/gd200505greatestcourses.pdf"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">the actual ranking&nbsp;numbers for each top 100 course</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">, while </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/courses/americasgreatest/index.ssf?/courses/americasgreatest/gd200505rankingcriteria.html"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">this link takes you to the criteria and listings of new and former courses</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> from the list. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://golfdigest.com/pdf/gd200505bestinstate.pdf"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The best in each state are here. And finally, the Golfclubatlas.com discussion.</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>     <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Nominations for most bizarre: A) Top 50 classics Baltimore and Wannamoisett dropping off the list, B) Flint Hills National debuting ahead of Riviera, Garden City and Kittansett (C) Rich Harvest Links making the list with some artificial turf tees, (D) Dallas National making it even though it finished 2nd&nbsp;in the 2003 Best New competition while #1 Black Rock and #3 Friars Head don&rsquo;t cut it, (E) Mayacama (?!) over Valley Club and Pasatiempo, (F) The National Golf Links making the top 10, (G) The National Golf Links on the same list as Trump International.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241795.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Johnson Responds Via Email</title><category>2005 Masters</category><dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/2005/9/1/johnson-responds-via-email.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">33128:302946:241794</guid><description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Thomas Bonk in the LA Times (reg req.) </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-masters4apr04,1,7530951.story?coll=la-headlines-sports"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">writes that the back nine heroics at Augusta were a product of the recent course changes</span></a></span> and that rain caused the two-year window of dull changes. And Chairman Hootie Johnson responded to Bonk via email, which naturally produced some interesting comments and a misspelling.&nbsp;<br /> <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"> <br /> &quot;All along, we thought the changes we made were appropriate and necessary to maintain the integrity and shot values of the golf course,&quot; Hootie said. &quot;We wanted to adhere to the design concepts that Bobby Jones, Cliff Roberts and Alistair [sp.] Mackenzie had envisioned.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Yep, they loved narrow fairways guarded by trees alright! </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">&quot;Last year certainly was thrilling, as the best players in the world responded. The course setup for Sunday was consistent with previous years, allowing the players the opportunity to try for an eagle or birdie when necessary.&rdquo; </span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffshackelford.com/archive0505/rss-comments-entry-241794.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>