"There's more scoring in soccer."
Steve Elling joins the chorus calling for Augusta National to turn back the clock. Several fine points:
It's irrelevant what the television ratings will say, because history has proven people will watch the Masters no matter the conditions or leaderboard. But has there ever been a more dreadful two-year period in modern history with regard to excitement and goosebumps?
Short answer: No.
And...
We watch the Masters for birdies and crazy rallies, like those managed over the past quarter-century by Jack Nicklaus and Phil Mickelson. Masters memories were not intended to be nightmarish, even for the winner.
And this quote, which I didn't see anywhere else from the former USGA President:
"We've got them all in the honey holes," said Fred Ridley, chief of the ANGC competition committee, shortly before the leaders teed off Sunday.
Yeah, but the course itself was still a bear. Ridley, it has been sarcastically noted elsewhere, was once the president of the USGA, where extreme course set-ups that cross the line have become the stuff of legend over the years. But in fairness, the changes to Augusta pre-date Ridley's arrival.
But let's never forget just how closely tied the USGA and Augusta National have been in recent years. If it weren't Ridley, it'd be someone else protecting par.
As a final plea to the club for a return to moderation, consider the performance of arguably the greatest player in the history of the game over his past three-plus seasons at Augusta. Over his most recent 13 rounds, Woods has posted exactly one round in the 60s and broken par a total of five times.
Funny that the club has initiated a program last week to allow kids into the tournament for free. Had I watched Sunday's play as a teenager, I would have bought a soccer ball the very next day.
After all, there's more scoring in soccer.
Could Billy Payne's global initiative actually be opening the door for unprecedented criticism of the course? We'll see...





















Monday, April 14, 2008 at 07:52 PM
Reader Comments (3)
So we thought we might at least beat the traffic on Washington Rd. No such luck. Most everyone seemed to leave at about the same time.
Amazing. Sad.
I'm not saying that birdies and heroic charges into the lead aren't exciting, but you can't exactly engineer a golf tournament. Was the Masters an exciting, nail biting, thrill fest EVERY year before the course changes?
Posting on this blog goes back and forth between "golf is too easy today, players are pu$$ies and just want to make birdies all the time" to "the USGA is out of control with a$$inine, overly difficult course set ups."
So which is it? Do we want to see lots of eagles because they can hit 6 and 7 irons into par 5s, or do we want an "appropriate" test, whatever that is.
We're so soaked in media coverage and analysis when it comes to the Masters that people look at it as a caricature of itself.
The great guys don't always win. Had Tiger made all those putts Sunday, wouldn't it have qualified as a "charge"?