"It will take strong leadership but men like that are few and far between. Those in control at the moment can't seem to get anything done."
Tony Jimenez relays Tony Jacklin's eloquent summation of the game's sorry state (thanks reader Chris). Obviously these remarks, which appear in Golf World UK, are most powerful because we are seeing yet another person connecting the dots between the distance chase, slow play, higher maintenance costs, stagnation of the golf business and governing body futility. You go Tony:
"The ball is predictable, the equipment is predictable, the greens are better and so more predictable," Jacklin said in an interview with Golf World magazine.
"The game has lost the unpredictability it had say 40 years ago. Galleries and people are pummelled with advertising these days so they get used to stuff and it seems easy to convince them everything is all right."
Jacklin, who won the 1969 British Open and 1970 U.S. Open, drew a parallel between golf and the global economic downturn.
"Maybe it will be different when something has to be done but by then it may be too late," said the 65-year-old Briton who now lives in the United States.
"It is a bit like the financial mess the world is in. For too long no one wanted to address the underlying problems in the world economy then all of a sudden it was too late.
"No one wants to believe the game today is not as good as it was. Tiger disguises a lot of the problems."
Oh boy! And about those governing bodies?
"It will take strong leadership but men like that are few and far between. Those in control at the moment can't seem to get anything done," he added.
Jacklin, who led Europe to two Ryder Cup victories and a tie in four spells as skipper between 1983-89, was particularly critical of the United States Golf Association and the R&A, which governs golf in all countries except the U.S. and Mexico.
"I'm not sure the R&A and the USGA are properly shouldering the responsibility they have," said the Englishman. "They seem happy to let things go the way they are going and the manufacturers have a responsibility too.
"I don't accept that nothing can be done about the ball and how far it goes. The tours could make a decision on what players can use and do it that way."
Guess we shouldn't put Tony down for having high hopes the grooves will be the fix?
Jacklin was also scathing about the increasing length of modern layouts.
"They (officials) seem happy to keep on playing 7,600-yard courses that cost more to maintain and take forever to play," he said. "The length of time it takes to play now is the biggest problem.
"Who the hell wants to take five hours plus to play 18 holes? Not me."
Tony Jacklin, Champion Golfer Of The Year.
Friday, October 30, 2009 at 08:21 PM
17 Comments | in
R&A,
State of the Game,
Technology,
Tiger Woods,
USGA 





















Reader Comments (17)
Any change to the ball, speed of play, etc. will take a major ground swell.
Most of my rounds on Friday afternoons or weekends this summer took between 4 3/4 and 5 hours - and a lot of them were at a course that should be played in no more than 4 hours, regardless of how busy it is.
The governing bodies need to wake up and realize that the world is moving so quickly these days that most people do not have 3 hours, never mind 5+ hours, to set aside for golf. The number of players will continue to contract until the game becomes less expensive, more fun for the average golfer, and faster.
One reason might be that for every Tony Jacklin aged 65 there are 1000 club presidents aged 65 who can't now become 'Champion Golfer of the Year' but want the kudos of a more local victory, such as a Tour event, an R&A or USGA event. Course 'improvements' will be their chance.
Another reason might be that there are few elegant narratives in play right now. I think that's why Jacklin's comments sound so refreshing, as if he's reminded us of a good story we haven't heard for a while. But there's a double-edged sword here with tradition on one side, 'has-been' on the other and lots of blood on the blade.
Tiger will be in Melbourne next week and I fear for Kingston Heath's reputation if he cleans up. That would not be elegant at all.
The distance the golf ball flies - when hit by certain players with high ball speed - has changed the basic challenges of the game for those players. If we (the knowledgeable golf community) believe it must be changed "back to the good old days" then a distance rollback of 10% should be legislated by the USGA, R & A and the professional tours. . . There should be golf balls for the rest of us that perform as today's do for lower golf ball speeds.
The idea of rolling back the ball and equipment for amateurs and pro's alike is a bit like forcing tee-ballers to play baseball on fields with 90ft base paths and 400 ft fences. Sure, they could play the game on a big league field, but what would be the point? Tradition?
I have no interest at all in playing a balata ball ever again.
Old enough to remember a time when most golf courses were private, and when good public courses were few and far between. So it irks me just a bit when people say that the game is in a "sorry state."
What's it called when you long for a time that never really existed?
10.31.2009 | Unregistered Commenter Greg
Sobriety.
This craving for harder courses is in direct response to a very small percentage of golfers who perversely have gained huge advantage using equipment that was actually originally designed to help the higher handicap golfer.
Why not let normal mortals enjoy themselves and produce a tournament ball for all elite competition for the very few golfers who are indirectly making golf boring and miserable for so many.
A week before, I walked Bethpage Black as a single with three guys -- a father and his two sons -- on a Friday, and we headed for the clubhouse after holing out in the dark on 17 with 6.5 hours of golf behind us, and with a threesome continually driving into us as we waited again and again for clear greens to hit our approach shots.
Where does one place the blame?
Great post. How often I have thought about how fun it would be to watch Tiger play with the best clubs made in 1960. We know he would adjust and play full out, however, to see him struggle with that era of equipment would be entertaining.
I also miss the swing variety you used to see on tour. Now all swings are pretty much the same. Thank goodness for Jim Furyk!
Loved reading you, will be back!
Cheers,
Catherine