"I suggested to Tiger several months ago that now he's in the golf course design business that maybe he bring one of his guys down here to take a look"
There seems to be no shortage of talk about Tiger's appearance fee in Australia and a calculated effort to spin it as a chance for him to brush up on his design expertise, not for the $3 million he's reportedly receiving.
Mark Hayes and Michael Warner in the Herald Sun talked to Sunshine Stevie Williams and lived to write about it:
The golfing superstar was holed up inside his luxury Southbank hotel suite, but continued his pre-Masters reconnaissance mission by sending his caddie to inspect the course.
Steve Williams spent two hours recording distances on all 18 holes in a sign his boss is determined to earn his giant $3 million pay packet.
"I suggested to Tiger several months ago that now he's in the golf course design business that maybe he bring one of his guys down here to take a look," Williams revealed.
"And he's done that, because in such a small, concentrated area, you've got some of the best courses in the world. The design and the bunkering on this course is unique and very, very good.
"I'm sure he (Tiger) will be looking at it tomorrow."
Now, if he goes to see some other courses in his spare time like Crenshaw would, then we'll know he really is serious about this design stuff.
Meanwhile on the appearance fee, Peter Stone opened his story today with this anecdote:
TIGER WOODS is relentless in his pursuit of Jack Nicklaus's record 18 major victories - with just four left to equal the Golden Bear. So, with a sense of mischief, let's suggest another way he could emulate the great Nicklaus.
We'll go back to the 1975 Australian Open, the first of four opens sponsored by the late Kerry Packer at The Australian, when Nicklaus headlined the field for a modest appearance fee.
Like Woods, Nicklaus was undisputed world No.1 at the time. Nicklaus asked Packer what prizemoney was on offer that week and, when told, Nicklaus immediately added his fee to the purse, which brought total prizemoney to $35,000.
So began the Packer/Nicklaus solution to appearance money. In following years, each invited player was paid $6000 and, in 1976, total prizemoney was lifted to $200,000.
This week, the Australian Masters purse is $1.5 million and Woods is reportedly receiving a $US3m ($3.3m) appearance fee.
Would Woods do the same as Nicklaus this week? Dream on.
But most of the fretting over the amount looks like it'll prove futile, because as Steve Elling notes, the event is looking like a hit, no thanks to Greg Norman:
But hand it to the Aussies, they had not seen Woods in 11 years, and he once again proved to be the game's ultimate show pony. Officials reported selling all 100,000 tickets (capped at $44 Australian dollars per round) for the week, and presumably, the Victorian government has a chance of finishing in the black once all the hotel stays, car rentals and incidentals are tolled. By the way, the tax hit in Australia is a shade under 50 percent in this bracket, so Woods will be contributing to the Oz coffers himself, too. Ah, economics in the 21st century, huh?
And judging by Patrick Smith's cranky reaction, someone in IMG's PR department has done a fine job overprepping the media for Tiger's arrival.
The reaction it must be said was childish and so fevered that normally sensible people lost the plot. Helicopters chopped above Essendon Airport, TV cameras covered this angle, that angle. Print journalists jotted down his every move. Even moves he might have made but didn't.
When he set his left foot on the tarmac, the world's greatest golfer said: "This is one small step for Tiger, one giant leap for golf". Or apparently words to that effect. Tiger's entourage is apparently colour-coded to make it easier to control them. It was noted who went into the different-coloured cars. Even the luggage van was described to radio listeners.
Monday, November 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Reader Comments (15)
If this is correct Geoff, someone at IMG clearly forgot to tell Tiger:
MEDIA: When you look over the back of the 15th green, do you
see a no-go zone or do you see something that's good for
your course design career in the future?
TIGER WOODS: You try and pick up a golf course, how to play
it. I'm not really looking at golf course design right
now. I'm trying to figure out how to play this golf
course so I can give myself a chance to win the
tournament.
Comparing Tiger to Jack is absurd. Jack was trying to get the event off the ground, and in the process generate endorsements for himself. Kerry Packer did Jack innumerable favors over the years. Jack got his investment back.
Tiger should "donate" his fee into the tournament purse? This is not a mini tour event nor is Karl Marx the event operator. . . His fee evidently did not require a tour of other great Australian golf courses nor his writing a sequel to Tom Doak's "Confidential Guide.". . . We all would agree that there is every chance the tournament will get appropriate value with Tiger contending to win on Sunday.
So, what exactly is the problem?
Oh - let's also keep it a secret that Tiger traditionally plays in events that his sponsors happen to run. 'Endorsements' are much, much different than 'appearance fees' (wink, wink).
I have no problem with Tiger getting the appearance fee. I'm not big on governments putting out the coin, but I'm not an Aussie.
What I find strange is why such a paltry sum (to Tiger) influences where he plays. I would think netting 1.5 million to be of no consequence to him, but it seems to be.
Everyone has a price, I am just surprised that his is this low.
Packer would have made sure Jack didn't leave these shores short changed. Maybe he bought one of Jack's kidneys