Monday
Dec142009
The Anatomy Of A Corporate Divorce, Tag Heuer Edition
So I see Tag Heuer is spending the next few weeks "assessing" its deal with Tiger. My question to the one of thousands of corporate crisis counselors out there: is this first step designed to soften the blow when the inevitable Tag-Tiger divorce happens, or is it to generate two publicity cycles instead of just one in the clean break scenario?









Monday, December 14, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Reader Comments (18)
I think Tag is doing the "We're thinking about it" thing until he wins Bay Hill in a couple months and then he's "always been our guy".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/dec/14/tag-heuer-tiger-woods
He certainly was not the master of his domain.
On the news tonight it will have morphed into "Tag dropped Tiger today"...
...so they get the benefit of having appeared to drop him (some would see that as a benefit anyway) while their legal team goes through every syllable of the contract to see exactly what their options are, and how much it will cost them if they do decide to get out of the contract.
Supposedly they are talking to bookies, pit bosses and sports book operators about Phil M and how he is able to afford wearing nothing but $1,000 a pair exotic skin golf shoes. . . They are interviewing alcohol tax agents, highway patrolmen and some Preachers about Kenny Perry's fleet of muscle cars and his making large contributions to churches entirely with $20 bills. . . Preliminary planning is underway to look into Ian Poulter's wardrobe and whether PETA is concerned. . . It may be we have only seen the tip of the iceberg regarding scandal and our golf professional heroes.
Who the hell would ever buy a Tag Heuer when they could buy a Patek Phillipe, Audmar Piguet, Piaget, Baume et. Mercier or even an Omega watch instead?
Rolexes are only bought by those that don;t know anything at all about Swiss watches.
... still- Ttag ought to Tag him out.
While I don't wholeheatedly concur with your Rolex comments, here lately they are doing everything possible to drive the brand into the ground, that's for sure.