Tuesday
Jul142009
What Would The PGA Tour Gain...
...by taking over the LPGA Tour, as was mentioned in Sirak's story on the leadership changes?
I can think of a few positives and negatives, but I'd love to hear what you all think of this idea.










Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Reader Comments (17)
You can make the argument that the sponsors for PGA Tour events are not the same pool of candidates as the LPGA Tour because of size and cost but if the PGA Tour was trying to find sponsoirs for LPGA tour events, would that have negative effect on keeping/getting sponsors for the Nationwide Tour?
Just imagine...
Tiger Woods-Lorena Ochoa vs. Phil Mickelson-Ya Ni Tseng
Ian Poulter-Morgan Pressel vs. Stewart Cink-Christina Kim (all twitter-showdown)
Adam Scott-Natalie Gulbis vs. Camilo Villegas-Michelle Wie
David Duval-Cristie Kerr vs. Sergio Garcia-Suzann Pettersen
Geoff Ogilvy-Karrie Webb vs. Steve Stricker-Juli Inkster
Kenny Perry-Angela Stanford vs. Davis Love III-Brittany Lincicome
Hunter Mahan-Paula Creamer vs. David Toms-Kristy McPherson
Jim Furyk-Se Ri Pak vs. Zach Johnson-Ji-Yai Shin
Anthony Kim-In-Kyung Kim vs. K.J. Choi-Na Yeon Choi
Ryuji Imada-Ai Miyazato vs. Shingo Katayama-Momoko Ueda
Retief Goosen-Ashleigh Simon vs. Jason Day-Katherine Hull
Kevin Na-Jee Young Lee vs. Charlie Wi-Seon Hwa Lee
Mike Weir-Alena Sharp vs. Rory Sabbatini-Helen Alfredsson
and so on...
I should think that the LPGA would be fearful of permanent-minor-league-status if it were to come under the PGA Tour umbrella. Nationwide Tour status.
There is a model, of course, and that is the NBA/WNBA, which does not seem to have served womens' professional basketball particularly well. (Personally, I think that women's golf is a far better product than women's basketball will ever be, but that's just me.)
This would help promote lady professionals in the club setting. Many are outstanding teachers with no less qualification than a Harmon, a Haney or a Leadbetter.
Roberto's idea also makes sense too, in a similar vein. Although I don't think there would be enough money to justify it.
Finchem has his hands full trying to keep a struggling Senior Tour with enough tournaments and promote the Nationwide Tour. Adding the LPGA adds nothing. Doesn't help TV ratings, doesn't help get more sponsors for the PGA Tour,
The LPGA would become #3 or #4 in the lineup and that will not work with the LPGA players, nor should it in my opinion.
There use to be a co-ed tournament - called the JC Penney Classic where a PGA Tour player and LPGA player made a team. A fun event held in the Tampa area but the PGA TOUR killed the event because they wanted another full field tournament on the PGA TOUR and all of the prize money instead of splitting with the LPGA.
She needs to know I'm her good luck charm.
The only two times I've actually watched women play golf was when Juli won the Open in Mississippi and Kansas.
Otherwise, I don't give a flip about the LPGA.
The people who write about the LPGA or cover the LPGA in mainstream media (i.e. golf.com, the magazines, or televised LPGA events, Golf Channel, etc.) don't ever have any stories to share about any of the Koreans.
I - and I dare say a heck of a lot of other golf fans - simply aren't going to expend the energy to go try to find a reason to relate and/or root for the Asian players.