"We have a 50-50 chance of being here next year."
Reading the AP blurb that went out suggesting the $1.4 million Jamie Farr Classic has only a 50-50 chance of returning in 2010, it was hard not to wonder if anyone at the LPGA is thinking that it might be nice just to have some tournaments next year, regardless of purse size and market?
Then I see that Beth Ann Baldry raised this very point in a tough Golfweek.com plea for the Brand Lady to wake up before it's too late. Calling the LPGA "a floundering tour with flourishing talent" Baldry writes:
The days of Bivens doing too much too soon should be over. The LPGA needs to bend over backwards to make things work from here on out. The tour needs strong partners such as Wegmans, a supermarket chain in the Northeast (Everyone’s got to eat, right?) now more than ever.





















Thursday, July 2, 2009 at 08:20 AM
Reader Comments (17)
Or was Annika's presence what kept tournaments around? Something is just not right about what's going on with the LPGA right now.
It would be a tragedy if Toledo loses the Jamie Farr Classic. I agree with Baldry that she (Bivens) needs to make it work at any cost.
'Vision 2010' and Plan B don't jive.
Indeed, it is. Jamie (Corporal Klinger) Farr is a native of Toledo and has lent his name and support to this tournament since 1984. Had The Brand Lady been in charge of the PGA TOUR back in the day, can you imagine what her "vision" would have done to Bing, Andy, Frank, Sammy, Glen, Jackie...? Sheesh. I suppose she would have left Byron alone, but you can't be too sure. What a maroon!
Oh sorry, I already said that once.
Re The LPGA and its MO, why all the acrimony?
The link the Constructionist mentioned contained this:
'The SBS and the LPGA Tour ended a long relationship in a bitter breakup to start the season.
The Korean media giant felt disrespected when the tour agreed to a lucrative, long-term deal with SBS's much-smaller competitor, J Golf, for an exclusive TV deal in the golf-crazed Asian nation.
The Baldry article had this (hard to follow, but seemingly scrappy):
'Wegmans LPGA is one of seven domestic events with expiring contracts this year. Longtime tournament director Linda Hampton said the LPGA waited until last week to begin serious contract negotiations with Wegmans. Bad timing.
“We’ve had all year to talk about this,” Hampton said. “We wanted to run the event and not be distracted. We just said we’re not going to do it (now). And we didn’t.”
The LPGA rebuts the notion that a dialogue about longterm renewal didn’t start until tournament week, saying the tour has been very “active and flexible.”
“We’ve been actively engaged with all our tournaments on renewal discussions,” said David Higdon, the LPGA’s chief communications officer. “Clearly that’s our priority for this year.”'
And then there was the earlier feud where either Corning or Shop-Rite basically called the Tour a liar for their public statements re. the negotiations or lack thereof.
Anyone know of a business model where it's advisable to get into public squabbles with your nominal partners/benefactors?
Bivens ran off the Shoprite event in NJ and replaced it with a swindling real estate man by the name of Ginn. The Shoprite was one of the longest standing ladies events and was the leading aggregate giver to charity of any LPGA event. In the event you didn't know, Shoprite is a grocery business, they tend to hold up in almost any economic scenario. Finally, just google -- Ginn Hilton Head -- and you'll have enough information to decide doing business with Ginn is a non-starter (Bivens didn't take time to make the google).
So how do you rationalize that cluster f*ck in the context of lousy economy thesis?