"If we lose Match Play, Tucson will surely turn to dust and be blown to El Paso."
Greg Hansen makes a plea to Accenture to keep the Match Play in Tucson beyond 2011 when they can take it elsewhere. Love the hometown spirit, but the event falls painfully flat as a form of entertainment and it's hard not to blame a soulless, spread-out and not-particularly engaging Nicklaus course as the main problem. Throw in small crowds and it just isn't working.
These insecurities became manifest about 10:47 a.m. Saturday when sunshine was replaced by a wintry mix of hail, rain and wind estimated by finalist Ian Poulter as "blowing 30 mph."
About 1,000 revelers camped at the Walter Hagen Club put down their bloody marys and headed for home. Hours later, as Paul Casey and Camilo Villegas played into the darkness, on-site attendance was probably no more than 1,500.
Hansen also reveals that the course was much better received this year by players thanks in part to this;
In 2009, many players, including Tiger, had a litany of complaints about "tricked up" greens. The Ritz people acted swiftly; by April, they had reworked and modified 17 of 18 greens at a cost near $100,000.
"They're flawless now," said quarterfinalist Stewart Cink.










Sunday, February 21, 2010 at 07:20 PM
Reader Comments (10)
That is an odd number. They are USGA greens and it's hard to redo them without a total blow up, which would be about $100k PER green. I sense no one wants to talk about what was done there out of respect for Nicklaus, which is perfectly understandable. After all, when tour players complain about architecture, there's a 50/50 chance they're way off base!
And recently, Arnold Palmer and his design company designed and built an outstanding course specifically for the event: The Classic Club. It was dropped from the rotation after, I believe, three years for the same reason: the players, led by one well-known left-handed player, thought it was too difficult and "unfair" since the wind might blow there more than the other courses.
John
In this case "redoing 17 greens" doesn't mean what you guys think it means. I think they probably just stripped the grass and tweaked the slopes with the greens mix - not altering the gravel layer etc. Geoff, your number of $100,000.00 per green is high. They can be built from scratch for just over half that amount - if you factor in that there are tons of hungry golf course contractors on the verge of going out of business, the price will get even better.
--oh wait, that's where we are. And we wonder why golf isn't that interesting unless Tiger's in the field.
The fact that the changes were made shows just how little tolerance there is for variation amongst the pros.