"Old beat-up vets like me … they'll mow us over."
Martha Groves of the Los Angeles Times looks at concerns veterans have about a nonprofit group's takeover and $6 million plans to convert the West Los Angeles "Heroes Course" into a practice facility for the UCLA golf teams, as well as to "improve" the course for the vets.
Stan Dawson, 71, of Santa Monica, who plays the course nearly every day, remains unconvinced that vets will come out on top when it comes to securing tee times. "I think UCLA will be calling the shots, and vets will get the short end of the stick," he said. "Old beat-up vets like me … they'll mow us over."
Stephen Peck, president of U.S. VETS, sought to allay concerns, saying that "100% of the time veterans get priority, particularly hospitalized vets and vets in the community." Members of the public will also be allowed to play, as they are now. Greens fees range from $3 to $13. Hospitalized vets play for free with recreational therapists.
Stretches of the 1,144-yard course look threadbare. The layout leaves golfers driving blind, as it were, hitting balls over the heads of other players. Safety is a prime goal of the overhaul, as is ensuring that every hole will be accessible to disabled golfers using special carts.
Having played the course I can speak to its merits as just the kind of place golf doesn't have enough of. The "VA Course" is one of those great little places in golf which, even in its "threadbare" state, serves as the perfect place for a nice mix of golfers to go and enjoy themselves. The photo by Christina House that ran with the story (above) so beautifully sums up what makes the place great: a dad out teaching his son where no one cares how you look, how you dress or how you swing. It's a place to get the kinks out and learn how to be comfortable with such a daunting game. Or if you're a disabled vet, it's just the right size, scale and atmosphere to get in some exercise.
Yes, the facility has seen better days and surely could use some minor improvements. And contrary to what the story says, it's not any less safe than most other par-3 courses where beginners and old choppers are out slashing it around. But a $6 million (!?) project that is essentially driven by the UCLA golf programs to add a recruiting toy? Precisely the kind of thing the vets do not need.









Monday, February 7, 2011 at 06:35 PM
Reader Comments (12)
Sorry for the come to Jesus speech but I really hope this is what UCLA is already thinking...
I know the UCLA athletic department. They are thinking of ways to make money. With the VA next door for the past 70 years, they sure waited a long time to decide to start helping the vets.
Furthermore with Bel Air CC across the street from the campus, the Bruin golf program is not going to suddenly come alive with a refurbished 9 hole course. The men's and women's programs are doing just fine thank you.
My worldview is shattered. You mean to say our alma mater isn't just looking out for student athletes?
As Lynn S. said, the UCLA athletic program doesn't need any sympathy. The golf team practices at Bel Air C.C., and they have a small practice facility on campus. The baseball program is thriving and the newly re-modeled again Jackie Robinson Stadium (it wasn't that old in its current incarnation) on the same V.A. property now includes a state of the art behemoth of a batting cage. It is an eyesore at best, and they have claimed the before public lot for their own as well. I doubt that they have any opportunities for the veterans in their sight. Maybe they let them watch the practices for free.
Let's hope that this changing of the guard--occupation of the wonderful golf course will also include new and ample opportunities to help the new crop of veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
The Los Angeles National cemetery sits between UCLA and the VA property and has over 87,000 graves--Civil War to the present. We can only hope that it is safe from the developers.
Steve C.
As for the architect they have chosen? Those pie shaped bunkers with sand filled way to overflowing at the Santa Anita municipal course are not a good sign.
Looks more like 30 plus acres to me on the layout on the website. Does anyone know what the area is?
Surely the course could be "fixed up" for a million or two- it's a public 9 hole par 3 course- and the balance spent in better ways