Second PGA Tour Tweeter Goes Missing After Calling The President Less Than Flattering Names
Pat Perez, he of the "I didn't submit that Tweet" fame following Barack Obama's re-election, joins the infamous Charlie Beljan as PGA Tour Tweeters who left the Twittersphere after taking on the President of the United States.
Perez's Twitter account disappeared Wednesday following the election.
Who is responsible?
The Secret Service?
The Ponte Vedra Secret Service?
Navy Seal Team Tweet?
A fixer representing "The Committee To Get Tim Finchem-An-Ambassadorship-Anywhere-But-Benghazi-During-An-Obama-Second-Term"? (The acronym is CTGTFAAABBDAOST for those of you DC types.)
Or a nervous sports agent advising against future social media outreach to extend the brand platform?
We'll never know…or really care.
Some followers did, however, share their views on Perez's f-bomb laced Tweet that led to his untimely departure from Twitter.









Wednesday, November 7, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Reader Comments (19)
DM
Really? I'm trying to determine if that comment came from blind partisanship or simple ignorance. So, in your world, the stock market indices purely reflect presidential performance (ignoring European economic worries or the hundreds of other factors)?
Playing along with your "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" logic:
Dow Index-
November 2000: ~10,600
November 2004: ~10,500
November 2008: ~ 8,900
November 2012: ~12,900 (even after you concerning day yesterday)
In your worldview, President Obama must have been the best president of the last 12 years, by a huge margin.
Look, you can have reasonable points why you may be conservative vs liberal (even though that type of oversimplified black/white worldview is just as intellectually stunted as your above attempted correlation). However, that's the problem. Blind partisans try to pass off their "bumper sticker logic" as being the obvious solution to incredibly complex issues.
The reason many of these pros were ripped is that they demonstrated (proudly) their oversimplified ignorance of complex issues. When you utilize hyberbolic sentiments such as "all my tax money is supporting lazy welfare people" or "socialism is just around the corner", you either:
A) Are insulting the intelligence of your audience, because you are smart enough to know better but assume they're not
or
B) Are really too stupid not to realize that it's not that simple
Don't get me wrong - some liberals have their own set of oversimplified nonsense - but most of what was demonstrated in Tuesday's Twitter rants was the conservative flavor of nonsense.
All I'm asking from you is to refrain from adding to the din of oversimplified nonsense.