Tuesday
Feb192008
"I'm sure they're thrilled in China"
Doug Ferguson considers the state of the World Golf Championships and it isn't pretty.The longer the "World" Golf Championships are anchored in America, the more they look like any other tournament. As more PGA Tour events keep raising their standards, the more they rival WGC events that were meant to be special.How could he say that about The Gallery or Mount Juliet Conrad or Valderama or The Grove or Bellerive or Capital City Club?
"I don't see them moving forward," Adam Scott said, an opinion shared by many of his peers. "It's not different for the money.
"They're not playing them on great golf courses. It's just another event. They've lost some of the lustre they once had."
"It would be great if, like their name, they actually were held around the world," Lee Westwood said. "It's a disgrace.Doug's being charitable here...
"You might as well call them the World Golf Championships of America. They're just like any regular U.S. tour event. It's a good way for getting players to come to the states more regularly. But they're not World Golf Championships."
The WGCs lost their momentum the first time all three were held in the United States, in 2003, particularly an atrocious site north of Atlanta that delivered all the excitement of an NFL preseason game. A rotation that once featured Spain, Ireland and Australia now has settled into Arizona, Miami and Ohio.
There is a practical side to this. The corporate sponsor footing the bill gets more value from the U.S. market. TV money comes from America, and ratings shrink when a tournament is held five times zone away, if not more.
"While it's called an international golf series, it probably hasn't represented that in terms of venues," said Gary Beckner, a senior marketing director for Accenture. "But for the most part, the players have been truly international."
Accenture suffered when Match Play went to Australia in 2001. It was held a week after the Christmas holidays, and some two dozen players didn't bother going.
"The contiguous U.S. works well for us," Beckner said.
Finchem will argue that the "world" component of this series comes from the players in the field and television beaming their birdies and bogeys into homes of golf fans around the globe.
"I'm sure they're thrilled in China," Westwood said.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 07:13 PM
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (9)
So if youre a fan of anyone besides Tiger or Phil (and perhaps Vijay or Els), you'll have no idea wtf is going on in your favourite golfers match.
What a joke.
What, exactly, is good for the game? That sounds like an awfully broad topic and the response will vary dramtically depnding on who is answering.
For instance, a Callaway shareholder would feel differently than a USGA director or a CBS executive or a real estate developer or a Tour event sponsor or Tiger Woods.
Or me. I could argue that golf would benfit from fewer golfers and fewer lousy golfers because courses would be emptier and a round would take 3 1/2 hours.
After defining the "good of the game", please explain American golfers are obliged to go overseas to help Chinese real estate developers sell golf course lots.