I finally got a few minutes to take in the entire Deane Beman address (text version) from last week's USGA Pace of Play event, and besides enjoying the image of folks squirming as he talked bifurcation of the rules where the rulemakers reside (and steadfastly oppose bifurcation), you have to admire the dry wit.
Beman, most certainly never considered for a sidekick role on The Tonight Show, turned the tide on the bifurcation discussion by accepting that we already have it, and why are we the big, bad governing bodies trying to get rid of bifurcated rules?
The former PGA Tour Commish lays out the ways we are bifurcated now (grooves, one-ball rule) and writes:
Why is it now so important to eliminate bifurcation? There is no evidence that bifurcation has hurt the popularity of our game -- just the opposite can be creditably advanced. Golf’s popularity was surging in the 1950’s and 60’s when two different size golf balls were played around the world. Don’t let the stance on bifurcation stand in the way of addressing some of golf’s problems.
He ties it into the slow play discussion and makes this point about longer, narrower courses in championship play making their way into the everyday game:
The problem of slow play, as well as the decline in the growth and financial viability of golf in the U.S., has some of its seeds from the well-intended notion that in order to identify “a worthy champion” in major championships, it was necessary to alter the playing field to accomplish that objective.
The Red Sox won the World Series and they are the undisputed world champions of baseball. Baseball did not feel the need to add another 10 feet to get to first base, grow longer grass in the infield or move the home run fence farther out. They also have bifurcated rules that allow a designated hitter in one league versus the other and were able to make a mutual accommodation for the World Series for the good and harmony of the game. None of these actions would lessen the crown that Boston wears or harm baseball as a popular sport.