Latest From GolfDigest.com
Latest From The Loop
Twitter
Feedblitz
To Get GeoffShackelford.com Posts Delivered To Your Inbox Enter Email Address Below:


Powered by FeedBlitz
Books
  • Lines of Charm: Brilliant And Irreverent Quotes, Notes, And Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
    Lines of Charm: Brilliant And Irreverent Quotes, Notes, And Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
  • The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Art of Golf Design
    The Art of Golf Design
    by Michael Miller, Geoff Shackelford
  • Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Golden Age of Golf Design
    The Golden Age of Golf Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
    Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
  • The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    by Geoff Shackelford
Current Reading
  • The Golf Book: Twenty Years of the Players, Shots, and Moments That Changed the Game
    The Golf Book: Twenty Years of the Players, Shots, and Moments That Changed the Game
    by Chris Millard
  • The Forbidden Game: Golf and the Chinese Dream
    The Forbidden Game: Golf and the Chinese Dream
    by Dan Washburn
  • The Early Days of Pinehurst
    The Early Days of Pinehurst
    by Chris Buie
  • Arnie, Seve, and a Fleck of Golf History: Heroes, Underdogs, Courses, and Championships
    Arnie, Seve, and a Fleck of Golf History: Heroes, Underdogs, Courses, and Championships
    by Bill Fields
  • The Magnificent Masters: Jack Nicklaus, Johnny Miller, Tom Weiskopf, and the 1975 Cliffhanger at Augusta
    The Magnificent Masters: Jack Nicklaus, Johnny Miller, Tom Weiskopf, and the 1975 Cliffhanger at Augusta
    by Gil Capps
  • His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir
    His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir
    by Dan Jenkins
Classics
  • Golf Architecture in America: Its Strategy and Construction
    Golf Architecture in America: Its Strategy and Construction
    by Geo. C. Thomas
  • The Course Beautiful : A Collection of Original Articles and Photographs on Golf Course Design
    The Course Beautiful : A Collection of Original Articles and Photographs on Golf Course Design
    Treewolf Prod
  • Reminiscences Of The Links
    Reminiscences Of The Links
    by Albert Warren Tillinghast, Richard C. Wolffe, Robert S. Trebus, Stuart F. Wolffe
  • Gleanings from the Wayside
    Gleanings from the Wayside
    by Albert Warren Tillinghast
  • Planet Golf USA: The Definitive Reference to Great Golf Courses in America
    Planet Golf USA: The Definitive Reference to Great Golf Courses in America
    by Darius Oliver
  • Planet Golf: The Definitive Reference to Great Golf Courses Outside the United States of America
    Planet Golf: The Definitive Reference to Great Golf Courses Outside the United States of America
    by Darius Oliver
Writing And Videos
« Video: When Golf Carts Burn And Melt | Main | Flash: Rory McIlroy Names Rory McIlroy His New Agent »
Friday
Sep272013

Must Read Digest Story: The Fox & The Peacock

Ron Sirak has written a lengthy, Michael Lewis-style inside look at the USGA-Fox Sports partnership and my only quibble is that the November Golf Digest story was not long enough. I highly recommend reading it before reading the analysis below.

While the average reader probably doesn't care about the insider moves analyzed here (scrolling is your friend), anyone with an interest in business, golf, common sense and television coverage of our beloved sport will find the revelations both fascinating and sad.

My kneejerk reactions:

  • USGA President Glen Nager will go down as the most obtuse leader in the history of the USGA. We learn he's been obsessing about the Masters drawing a higher rating than the U.S. Open and becoming the premier event in golf. His reaction is to then steer the USGA television contract to a network that has little chance of drawing a higher rating, especially when the price tag paid will require a longer broadcast and more commercial inventory, factors which should drive down the rating.
  • The money people tied to this deal think that driving up the rights fee is a great thing for golf. Yet there is never any suggestion the USGA required an investment in technology to enhance the quality of the broadcast? Or reducing commercial time, which the Masters and The Players have proven as the best way to make for a great viewing experience. The extra money derived from the deal will merely go to some investment account and fans will watch more commercials on a network that has never televised golf. 
  • Fox Sports was in the minds of those handling this much earlier in the process than we realized, with Sirak reporting that the USGA met with Fox representatives for the first time April. 
  • The role of USGA Executive Director is now very much secondary to the 2-year lame duck presidency post. In this case, the lameduck president is someone who not only does not appear to understand some very basic things about a golf telecast, but who also may have fudged the truth in the story (more on that later). Current ED Mike Davis very much works for President Nager, and based on this story, the ED job may even be less influential in the organization than someone like television contract negotiator Sarah Hirschland who steered the USGA to Fox Sports. This is definitely a change for the USGA which used to be a golf organization first, but which comes out of this story sounding like a corporation where golf is just the widget in question.
  • The people who stuck the USGA with this deal for 12 years will be gone by the start of the deal, or within a year or two of Fox Sports taking over. As Sirak portrays them in this story, none are lifers who love golf or care about the hard core fan, but instead are obsessed with some mythical "broader audience" that only Fox Sports knows how to tap. (Meanwhile, brace yourself for yet another year of Fox Sports drawing a record low World Series number unless the Dodgers and Red Sox meet.)

My only real quibble with the story was the lack of connection made between the timing of the announcement and Fox Sports 1's negotiations with cable companies over its subscriber fee. While most of us thought the USGA was announcing the agreement during the PGA Championship to stick it to the PGA of America for not supporting the anchoring ban, subsequent reporting and common sense suggest the rush to announce the deal was all about help Fox Sports 1 landing more money per-subscriber.  Armed with the USGA deal on August 7th, Fox Sports 1 was not able to get past $0.23 per subscriber for its August 10th launch, which is less than the Golf Channel currently gets.

In other words, the rush to sign the deal yielded nothing for Fox Sports and a whole lot of resentment toward the USGA.

Here are some of the highlights of the story, starting with Nager's mesmerizing quote about what drove him to push for a new broadcast partner. (And this for those of you who didn't go to law school).

"I told them that if you went back to the '70s and looked at TV ratings and other indicia of what makes a championship great, the U.S. Open was considered the premier major championship in golf," Nager says. "And that if we looked at indicia today, the Masters is considered the No. 1 major in golf. I said I wanted to work with a media partner that had a proposal to elevate the U.S. Open and the other USGA championships and the USGA as a governance organization." (The weekend rating of the 1973 U.S. Open beat the Masters, 9.0 to 8.4. The next year, the Masters edged ahead and began widening the gap after that.)

The only indicia I see where the U.S. Open competes with the Masters in the rating department is with 4 minutes of commercials an hour and a slightly shorter telecast. That ingenious standard stems from a year-to-year deal like the Lords of Augusta have, something Frank Hannigan explained in his letter on this topic. Glen Nager just tied the USGA up for 12 years with Fox Sports, meaning there is no incentive from competitors to offer such a broadcast.

Genius.

Sandy Tatum, who negotiated previous USGA deals and is a former USGA President who knows his stuff, touched on the contradiction in Nager's fantasy of a "premier" event clashing with exhorbitant rights fee:

"I would judge this as a transforming event," Tatum says of the FOX deal. "The challenge is very significant. How are they going to be able to justify the money they spent without increasing the commercial clutter of the telecast? That will destroy the telecast."

The story outlines the cultural change within the USGA that led us to this mess. Not surprisingly, Walter Driver's name comes up but so does Jim Hyler, the president immediately preceding Nager. And then there are the folks who steered and spun the current Fox Sports deal:

On Sept. 1, 2011, Joe Goode, a 15-year veteran at Bank of America, was named as managing director of communications and made a member of the senior management team. This was a tipoff of what was to come: The USGA was loading up leadership that did not come from the world of golf but was more experienced in the business world.

A week later, Hirshland left Wasserman Media Group for the USGA. And a month after that, the USGA nominated Nager to take over as president in February 2012, a spot most thought would go to Jay Rains. (Rains, considered close to Fay and NBC, was removed as vice president in 2011.) Nominated to the Executive Committee was Stevenson, who in 2007 sold his sports marketing and TV consulting firm, OnSport, to Wasserman.

The story explains the surprise appearance made by Arnold Palmer during NBC's 30 Rock presentation to the USGA group, which my sources say ended in a standing ovation for The King. There was also this terribly embarrassing moment for the USGA's legal firm considering the overall tone of the story, which suggests Fox was very much in their hearts all along, if not the choice from the outset.

Palmer gave an impassioned appeal that he believed it was in the best interest of the game to keep the package with NBC/GC. One of the lawyers from Proskauer asked for Palmer's autograph.

Casey Wasserman, head of the Wasserman Media Group that consulted on the deal (and full disclosure, who I have worked for at the Memorial Tournament the last two years), is cited as having been part of the process. His comments to Comcast CEO Brian Roberts at the annual Allen & Company gathering in Sun Valley are in dispute, but either version does not give a good impression of how the USGA/Wasserman side viewed the seemingly strong presentation of the incumbent.

Asked if Casey Wasserman told Roberts the USGA deal was going to go to auction—a move that would have altered NBC/GC's negotiating strategy. Jordan, the Wasserman executive, says: "That is absolutely not true. That sounds like sour grapes to me. I know Casey had a conversation with Brian, and he told him, 'You need to get serious about this, or you'll lose it.' "

Personally, I wouldn't be throwing around the term "sour grapes" in the same sentence as Brian Roberts, one of the most powerful men in media and corporate America. And second of all, the quote Dean Jordan does attribute to his boss Wasserman also doesn't look great when NBC, at least at this point in Sirak's version of events, has made such a huge offer that ESPN has already backed out. ESPN!

Now, here's where it becomes apparent that the USGA's representatives either (A) have no class (B) were set on Fox Sports, (C) were in a hurry to help Fox Sports 1 get a higher subscriber fee, or most likely (D) options A, B, C.

All bids were to be in by 5 p.m. Monday, Aug. 5, and NBC/GC upped its offer to a little more than $80 million and expanded its plan for massive promotion of the U.S. Open.

There was silence for 48 hours.

Then shortly after 5 p.m. on Wednesday, Aug. 7, NBC's Lazarus got a phone call from Nager breaking the bad news. FOX, which had never televised golf in the United States—though Sky Sports, also owned by News Corporation, does golf overseas—had the exclusive rights to the U.S. Open and the rest of the USGA properties for 12 years beginning in 2015. "The board made its decision on Wednesday morning, and our president informed NBC sometime Wednesday," Hirshland confirmed.

"Deals like this don't happen this quickly," says one former USGA staffer.

"Only four or five people knew what our offer was," says an NBC official. "When you're a longtime incumbent, you get some sort of hometown prerogative. Would we have matched? I don't know. They chose not to give us the opportunity. FOX ended at $93 [million a year], NBC just north of $80 [million]."

"With the benefit of hindsight, we're not sure the process was handled in the way that it was presented to us," says NBC spokesman Greg Hughes.

So (A) the USGA gets an extra $13 million a year by going with Fox, yet loses Golf Channel as a promotional partner (we don't need no stinking core audience!) and worse, appears to have had little integrity in the process when the spokesman is suggesting something fishy took place. 

When you are a non-profit rulemaking body integrity is kind of important, no?

Finally, if you come away from the story thinking President Nager had no imagination, think again. Picture the scene he paints as the deal was announced...

Nager was attending a PGA of America dinner in Rochester, N.Y., with many other golf dignitaries, when the news release hit. "Several people came over to congratulate me," Nager says. "One said it was the biggest thing to happen to golf since Tiger won the 1997 Masters."

That anyone in the golf's executive ranks thinks anything they do in the negotiating room equates to something like Tiger Woods winning the 1997 Masters, should probably be under Nurse Ratched's care.

That he expects us to believe people sought him out at a PGA of America dinner, much less congratulated him on a 12-year television deal announced on the eve of that organization's major, speaks to a certain emperor-not-wearing-anything-but-a-blue-blazer situation.

There was also this credibility blow to Nager and press release crafter Joe Goode:

The sentence in the USGA release that annoyed NBC and ESPN was this one: "The game is evolving and requires bold and unique approaches on many levels, and FOX shares our vision to seek fresh thinking and innovative ideas to deliver championship golf." Mike McQuade, who produces golf for ESPN, and NBC's Roy privately bristled at what they perceived as a knock on their ingenuity.

"We were disappointed that the USGA chose to disparage our production and the production of every media company [CBS, ESPN, Turner, Golf Channel, NBC] that covers golf instead of just being candid in choosing money over mission," says NBC's Lazarus.

Barely more than two hours after that press release about bold new directions went out, a former NBC executive now at FOX, David Neal, called Roy to talk about jumping to FOX. A close friend says Roy viewed the wording of the press release as "reprehensible" and told Neal thanks, but no thanks.

That's right, producer Tommy Roy, who couldn't be counted on to bring a bold, unique, fresh or an innovative approach for NBC's future USGA coverage, was offered the producing job by Fox Sports within hours of the deal's announcement.

Thumb's up to Fox Sports for recognizing Roy's quality work. There is hope for them yet.

The USGA? Not so much...

NBC sources say the 70 hours of coverage FOX will give the USGA's big three events is half that of what NBC/GC promised.

"False in every respect," Nager says. "The only one who would know that is us since we are the only ones who have both proposals. In terms of contractual commitments for our Opens—the men's, the women's and the seniors'—FOX proposed more, and for our amateur championships FOX proposed substantially more."

Of course, Nager would never actually show anyone the proposals and the parties involved will not violate confidentiality agreements to prove what they otherwise believe to be the truth. So we'll have to take Nager at his word.

After reading this story and the delusional dream of Nielsen superiority over the Masters, few will believe a word the USGA President says. The indicia suggest even fewer will take him seriously.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (31)

Good work by Ronnie. One question left unanswered is whether the USGA caved on the number of commercials, limited to 6 minutes per hour in the NBC deal (same number as with ABC), plus a minute for locals and a PSA from USGA per hour. Of course they could have afforded to go down to four, the Masters' magic number which makes its telecast so special and clutter free (and no promos for anything). This would mean a reduction in rights fees. Tatum's quote seems to indicate they might have given up on this number. We've seen what happens with the PGA Championship and tour events with no limits in place.

I was surprised to read the NBC/TGG bid reached $80 M.

Mark Carlson's role or non-role is intriguing. Says at one point he was still in charge of broadcasting area but left out of the process completely. I'm a little confused. I wonder if Terry Jastrow, the old ABC producer, might finagle his way into the mix for Fox.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterMedia driven
Geoff, thanks for showing us Ron's story with your brilliant narration. The corruption of the USGA by outside influences is so huge...
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterGarth Pancake
Great post Shack. Stick it to those clowns.

One small quibble. As one who did attend law school, indicia takes the form of the plural as in "indicia suggest" rather than "suggests".
Hearing that ANGC was in Nager's mind should not be a surprise to anyone.

Executive Committee members may as well wear team shirts (or different ties) depending on whether they represent the ANGC-side or the non-ANGC-side as that factor dictates the petty backroom politics of the Nominating Committee and, therefore, of the Executive Committee.

Presumptive President Thomas J. O'Toole, Jr. (a non-ANGC player who desperately wants to jump to the ANGC side) will provide a very interesting contrast to Nager as (1) he has pounded stakes at a qualifier, (2) he's as pro- Mike Davis as they come (I'll resist the urge to use a slang term that could lead to the deletion of this post).

Carlson and Bevacqua were in Davis' sights well before he and Hyler engineered Fay's "retirement."
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterCarl Peterson
It appears the USGA negotiators drank the FOX Kool-Aid early and often. A 12-year contract? The Green Jackets might have a thing or two to teach the Blue Blazers.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterMike T.
Great post. Things appear to be tense in Far Hills.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterSpaulding Smails
Anyone who writes using the word INDICIA scares the hell out of me. Nager reminds me of the kind of guy who gets a call for a recommendation and then says: "hey, I may be interested in that position". The whole scenario is disappointing but it shows how things can go downhill quickly when ego and power get involved. Great information.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenterol Harv
Within your choices of "A, B, C and D" You forgot the very strong circumstantial evidence that the USGA violated its existing contract's exclusive negotiating period.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterThe O
Oh, jeebus. I see that Charlie Foxtrot is not just a phonetic military abbreviation.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterKLG
Super analysis Geoff. Thanks.
Yeesh, it's a tableau of Greek mythology scale hubris.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenterdbh
Great work, Geoff. Davis is obviously powerless. Seems to be just the set-up man. He should bolt to the TOUR, make some real money and do what he does best, set up courses. Feel bad for Davis to be so neutered so publicly. He deserves better than this. Fay wouldn't have allowed this...guess that's why he's gone though.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterTerryMalloy
Terry,
Interesting, I never thought of that. And it'd be a great fit for the tour though I don't know how much Slugger White and Mark Russell want to give up of their schedules as tournament directors, but I could see Mike in their job plus being a voice of credibility for the tour in dealing with the rules issues that are going to be coming up. The rules staff is great, but Mike could be the voice for them on these issues as they inevitably continue to come up. He could also liven up the tour's course setup approach, which has improved dramatically in recent years but still could be even more dynamic with the right front man.

Thanks for the feedback, but it's Sirak and the editors who did the hard work. I just copy, paste and react!
09.27.2013 | Registered CommenterGeoff
Shackelford is THE MAN.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterJim
Please, no Mike Davis on the PGA Tour and no sympathy for this guy. I still blame him for a few of the ridiculous set-up features over the past few years as well as thinking he's an architect and can go in and do what he wants to golfs great historic golf courses, which he has altered. They all belong together IMO.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenterol Harv
Seems like Davis is just golf and zero business oversight. Interesting. The ED position is very different than what it was it appears. Half of what it was.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterGreenwichGolfer
If there is a problem with the ED then I would suggest Cialis. You can tell I watch golf on TV without a DVR.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterRickABQ
Based on comments here and the excepts used I can only think what took the USGA so long? Ever since Ping embarrassed them on the groove issue they have slowly cowered in the corner on the issues where they have authority but no competence. It now appears those in control chose simply to maximize their take rather than learn to write a proper technical specification that will hold up when challenged.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterMuni hack
Geoff, I could swear I saw you on golf channel at merion complaining bitterly about the setup. A setup so horrendous, according to you that, merion did not play anything like merion. Feinstein and Steve sands disagreed. So mike Davis reads about usga business decisions when the press release comes out. And he is a hack at setting up courses.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenterjoe
There is one reason the Masters outdoes the Open in ratings, and only one reason, the golf course.

On the jump to Fox, you can analyze this move all day but it comes down to money pure and simple.
Great work, all.

Muni hack says, ''issues where they have authority but no competence''

As far as I know the have not the competence to kep from getting robbed or ecovering a couple of trophies stolen a couple of years ago.

And these are the guys who have hundreds of pages on hitting a ball in a hole--- ''the authority---sadly.

Geoff -great work,again, and pass it on to the authors.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenterdigsouth
The Masters also out-draws the U. S. Open because it is a rite of spring. By mid-June, even golf fans have more and better options than watching a golf tournament on TV on a Sunday afternoon.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered Commenter3foot1
Alister MacKenzie could tell the USGA why The Masters out rates the US Open. One course is set up to encourage all the boldness and shotmaking MacKenzie loved and one is set up to highlight everything he hated - rough everywhere and plodding, negative golf.
09.27.2013 | Unregistered CommenterMike Clayton
I must admit that sending a check to the USGA for membership dues no longer feels compelling to me. I don't think I will have a tag on my bag next year.
09.28.2013 | Unregistered CommenterKevin part deux
joe,
I also wrote a story in Golf World pointing out how the Merion setup misfired. Mike has always encouraged me to point out when he gets things wrong and the last two years he did. I still think he's the best at what he does. But thanks for trying to keep me honest.
09.28.2013 | Registered CommenterGeoff
@Mike Clayton: +1. You nailed it. The Masters gets the highest ratings because of many factors, the main being the course itself. Being the first one of the year at a familiar course doesn't hurt either.

Fox is going to have to come up with something out of the box (and have it work right away) along with the USGA setting up their championship courses for more interesting play. Reducing and shifting fairways away from the optimal like of play is not the way to do it. Some of those holes at Merion looked just wrong from how the green was designed and where the fairway was cut. Same as the year before.

There may come a day when they put up some temporary obstacles in the form of large tents and advertising banners just off the fairway and going to up to 50 feet.
09.28.2013 | Unregistered Commenterjohnnnycz
Second Kevin -

I didn't renew my Dual Membership this year, and won't again, largely based on articles I have read in the blog over the past few years on USGA responses (or non-responses) to various issues. I had always thought the USGA was all about the good of the game, but eventually the truth dawns on even a naive optimist such as myself. They certainly don't need my dues anymore.
09.28.2013 | Unregistered CommenterRickABQ
Is there no limit to the clueless ignorance of the usga? Seriously, every single year some crusty relic sonorously intones that the USGA seeks to identify the best golfers, not embarrass them. Then we watch a tournament where cautious mistake free golf wins.

Now it comes out that in tiny, dark souls they wish to be LOVED? They pride themselves for brutal setups and then wonder why the masters is more popular?
I simply do not believe they are THAT clueless. They must know.

As a corollary, how freaking hard is it setup a course?
09.28.2013 | Unregistered Commenterjoe
@ Kevin, RickABQ, and all

Should there be a web site or some organized way for those of us that really play,follow and care about golf, who have supported the USGA with annual membership/tag, to express our feeling about the USGA's conduct? Losing one membership at a time doesn't seem clear/strong enough.
09.28.2013 | Unregistered CommenterDormie5
Gotta admire ole Sandy Tatum at 93 he is still sharp and provides a money quote on the issue!! Guess we'll have to wait and see how many commercials Fox is allowed to air...
09.28.2013 | Unregistered CommenterMedia driven
So what and who cares.

SW squared C

Life goes on. Suck it up and move on.
09.28.2013 | Unregistered CommenterStanley Thompson
Geoff - as always, you stoke the fire of discussion and ask some fair and challenging questions, but I have to take issue with a couple of characterizations made in your commentary. Full discloser, I worked with Wasserman for a number of years and am quite familiar with those named in the Sirak article.


You and I are both fully aware that the golf industry is absolutely tiny in the grand scheme of things. Everyone know everyone else - and in most cases has their nose in everyone's business. Add the fact that there are precious few media rights negotiating firms out there and the subset of power brokers in this negotiation is pretty small. And of course there is some nepotism in the USGA/Wasserman relationship - but is that necessarily a bad thing? Wasserman has a proven track record of TV rights negotiation and a golf pedigree. While I agree that EC members should not have a financial stake in choosing partners, this is a rather strong suggestion.


I find it virtually impossible that with all the posturing and discussion that anyone was actually "surprised". It's about ego.

You've pointed out the USGA has been taking it's lumps over the bumbling of rules, squabbles with other governing bodies and their own internal agendas. I'm of the opinion that several folks in Far Hills felt a need to make a statement to the industry. That statement is in the form of $1B and now the USGA can say it's got the most lucrative contract and that it's indicative of the position the organization holds. Whether or not the industry agrees, or even cares, is irrelevant - at least the USGA can feel good about it.

Fox has a bigger play in mind than the USGA, as they are launching a new network and desperately need content to fill the hours to challenge ESPN. EVERY network starting out does the same thing, and it's evident across the sports industry. Over the past 20 years, we have seen it so many times... Network launches, spends an outrageous amount of money for a cornerstone property, then at the end of the deal re-evaluates their metrics and cuts ties when a new suitor offers more.

Look no further than NBC and ESPN - the very folks that were "surprised" by Fox's pursuit. NBC just bought the rights to English Premier League Football ($250M+ per year), renewed the NHL deal ($2.0B, 10 year) and the Olympics through 2016 (insert Dr. Evil outlandish rights fee here). ESPN just renegotiated its ACC deal ($3.0B+, 14 years) and US Open Tennis ($875M, 11 year), just to name two. They valued the USGA deal based on the metrics and they didn't match FOX. So yes, this deal is about money, but aren't they all? As someone who has been in the room for discussions about these types of deals, it's really hard to NOT have an idea of whether someone is going to come to the table when this much money is on the line.

I'm very interested/concerned with how FOX will create their golf team and structure their coverage. As more of a traditionalist when it comes to golf, the thought of an animated golf robot a-la NFL is horrifying. For the love of the game, get someone that knows and respects it, then innovate the coverage.
09.30.2013 | Unregistered CommenterInsideTheRopes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.