Significant?

The 2005 PGA Tour driving distance average climbed to 288.9 yards, up from 287.3 in 2004. On the surface, not a huge one year leap. However, 18 weather-delayed events surely played a significant err, roll. Remember, the 2005 average was around 280 yards through the Masters. That's when we saw the "ranting distance killjoys" piece that declared everyone had their facts wrong, etc.

However, if one is to believe the USGA, R&A and PGA Tour, 2004 is not the significant comparison year. 2002 is. David Fay called it the "benchmark" during the NBC segment on USGA testing that aired during the U.S. Open.

In May 2002, the USGA and R&A issued the Joint Statement of Principles. Here's the key statement:

The R&A and the USGA believe, however, that any further significant increases in hitting distances at the highest level are undesirable. Whether these increases in distance emanate from advancing equipment technology, greater athleticism of players, improved player coaching, golf course conditioning or a combination of these or other factors, they will have the impact of seriously reducing the challenge of the game. The consequential lengthening or toughening of courses would be costly or impossible and would have a negative effect on increasingly important environmental and ecological issues. Pace of play would be slowed and playing costs would increase.

Faced with the following numbers comparing 2002 to 2005, will the R&A and USGA act in accordance with their Statement of Principles? Change has occurred at the "highest level." Notice that the troubling 1999 to 2002 increase is consistent with the 2002 to 2005 jump:
  • 2005 PGA Tour driving distance average: 288.9
  • 2002 PGA Tour driving distance average: 279.8
  • 1999 PGA Tour driving distance average: 272.4

Top 50 in Driving Distance Average PGA Tour

  • 2005: 300.6
  • 2002: 289.3
  • 1999: 282.0

Nationwide Tour Driving Distance Average

  • 2005: 294.3
  • 2002: 287.8
  • 1999: 279.0

Top 50 in Nationwide Driving Distance Average

  • 2005: 305.5
  • 2002: 298.3
  • 1999: 287.5

Champions Tour Driving Distance Averages

  • 2005: 273.9
  • 2002: 268.2
  • 1999: 263.9

European Tour Driving Distance Averages

  • 2005: 285.1
  • 2002: 281.9
  • 1999: 269.8

The governing bodies can at least point to a not-so-significant jump on the European Tour. However, the increases in distance average between 1999 and 2002 were considered significant enough that the Joint Statement of Principles had to be issued.The distance jumps from 2002 to 2005 are equal to the 99-02 increases.

Will they be deemed significant?
 

Final PGA Tour Driving Distance Watch

pgatour.jpgThe Drive to double last year's number of players over 300 yards in average driving distance came up just short.

Despite plenty of rain, the 2005 season finished with 26 players averaging over 300 yards. That's up one from last week, thanks to Brendan Pappas joining the list at #6 after registering enough drives.

Speaking of eligibility, Jason Gore and Ernie Els each averaged over 300 yards, but failed to hit enough drives to make the list.

Just one more friendly reminder (well, probably not):

  • In 2004, 14 players averaged over 300 yards.
  • 9 players averaged over 300 yards in 2003
  • John Daly was the only player averaging over 300 yards for the 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 seasons. 

And one other reminder, keeping in mind the USGA/R&A "line in the sand" year of 2002:

PGA TOUR:

  • 2002: 18 players averaged over 290 yards, 1 player averaged over 300 yards
  • 2005: 86 players averaging over 290 yards,  26 players averaging over 300 yards

Nationwide Tour:

  • 2002: 63 players averaged over 290 yards, 15 players averaged over 300 yards
  • 2005: 95 players averaged over 290 yards, 42 averaged players over 300 yards

 

 

Finchem's Statement

Lesson #1 from today's State of the Tour press conference? Leave the joke telling to Jackie Burke.

COMM. TIM FINCHEM: Thank you, Bob. We're delighted to be at this venue. The word "venue" reminds me of when we went to Champions in Houston and Jackie Burke took me aside and said, we're delighted to have you here, this is about ten years ago, and your people have sent me this contract to play here. You used this word "venue." I want you to know when I played on the PGA TOUR we played on the golf course and I don't know what a venue is, but we're going to play some golf this week.

Deafening silence from the assembled inkslingers. We continue... 

This morning rather than recap the year, I think all of you have done a good job recapping the year as we've gone through the year. We had a great year and have had a great year...We spent most of the year focusing on the future. And as we look at the future, we look at we reevaluate ourselves. For the past year or two, we've asked ourselves where are we and where should we be headed.

Okay Yogi, are you cutting tournaments or not?

We're not going to talk about the details of our schedule today, but when we do announce it after television I think you'll look at it and see that it's stronger, it has a better flow, we have better golf courses, better sponsor groups, et cetera, to make a good schedule. 

Oh good, better courses means Bellerive and Hazeltine. Can't wait. So for all of the betterness, things aren't so bad today, right? 

In terms of the business side of the equation, our sponsorship today is by far the strongest it's ever been. We have the strongest collection of sponsors on the PGA TOUR, we have the strongest collection of marketing partners, and the number of marketing partners we have, that's tripled in the last five or six years from 18 to 54. And we have a good group of marketing partners.

I think we have our key word of the day...marketing partners. Or is it strongest? What is a marketing partner anyway? Forget it. What about the Players Championship? Excuse me, THE PLAYERS Championship.

And then with respect to our tournaments themselves, starting with THE PLAYERS Championship, we will rebuild the infrastructure for THE PLAYERS Championship and changes the marketing approach for that tournament. We will bring and heighten the impact of our tournaments across the board going forward after 2005. So all that is in play.

And the way to do that?

...there is one pressing need, we think, to help us compete, and that is the need to define our season. You may remember 20 years ago almost now, this tournament started. And the reason it was started was to deal with the challenge of defining a season for our fans. We have a long season, a very long season. And in that season are tournaments which are week in and week out much more impactful than some other weeks.

(Note to the Commissioner: impactful gets a big nasty red line underneath it from MS Word).

Here's a little 135 sentence that I bet you can't read without rolling your eyes:

We think it's a system that will relate well to fan interest in trying to bring to those 112 million fans something they can focus on week in and week out, something that will create more value for our sponsors, something that will create more compelling television for our television partners, something that will create more excitement for our players, more opportunities for our players to be involved in something meaningful each week, and obviously more financial benefits to our players, and also something that we think will help us drive toward that second billion because we now have announced the commitment to get to the second billion so working with our tournament structure to really build the strength of our charitable giving back is fundamental to everything we do, including a year long competition.

Isn't it something that allows us to catch our breath after this first Drive to a Billion before we plug the daylights out of the Second Drive to a Billion?

As for the newly announced FedEx Cup points race:

Let me now turn to the FedEx competition, the FedEx Cup, and talk a little bit about the details. I want you to know that the details at this point stop at a certain point because a lot of the detail is not going to be worked out until 2006, and when that detail is worked out, we will have another visit where we lay out the promotional schedule and promotional themes of the Cup and our relationship with FedEx and how that's going to work, how the point system is going to work and things of that nature.

I know fans are on the edge of their seat about that promotional schedule and promotional theme concept, but here's where the details stop:

Players will compete for position on a points list starting the first week in January and going through late August. There will be a point where that portion of the competition stops, players will then be seeded for a four week championship series. The four week championship series will culminate here at the TOUR Championship presented by Coca Cola, but the first three weeks of that four week series will be at other tournaments around the country. 

What these seedings actually mean remains a mystery.

One, the players need to play to position themselves in a seeding position for the championship series, and the championship series will then be structured on points, which will be the most impactful series of events in the history of the sport.

There's that impactful stuff again. Here's where it gets confusing:

After the TOUR Championship, you can think of the fall series a number of different ways. One of the ways is that actually what players are doing is playing to position themselves to be in the Cup the following year. But in addition to that there will be overall eligibility on the PGA TOUR, securing a card, possibly a continuation of the Top 70 for certain events. 

So in the fall they'll be playing to keep their cards and position themselves for the following year's Cup (really original name idea there by the way, Cup...I wonder where that came from?). Later on someone asked for clarification on this and I'm not sure they got the answer they hoped for.

Okay, warning, MBAspeak answer of the day:

There are a number of benefits strategically to the stronger season. First of all, we think every one of our events is going to be strengthened. We think players are going to be motivated and incentivized to actually play more. Our television we think is going to be not only more impactful but more balanced because we'll have a better number of huge profile events at the end of the season which can tie to our different television packages. We think overall field strength will be supported, as well, and we think fan interest and some of the other things we're going to do, different platforms, can bring fans to be related to FedEx Cup competition during the course of the year. 

Incentivise, impactful, strength, strengthened and of course, platform. Great stuff.

He opened it up to questions from there, which will be looked at in a later post. Oh, and they also presented Adam Scott, Sergio Garcia and Olin Browne to confirm how great everything is, even though they didn't get to see a schedule either.

Finchem Press Conference Broadcast

According to the Tour's media site, Tuesday's "Briefing by PGA TOUR Commissioner Tim Finchem" will be viewable via a webcast on PGATOUR.com, starting at 10:00 a.m. ET Wednesday, November 2, 2005. Of course a full autopsy and tally of MBAisms will follow here as soon as a transcript is posted.

Top 125 Watch

For those following the Top 125 race, this, from the PGA Tour's media notes:

Four players fell out of the top 125 with one event remaining, next week’s Southern Farm Bureau Classic – Loren Roberts (No. 120 to No. 126), Nick Watney (No. 121 to 127), Michael Allen (No. 123 to No. 128), Ben Curtis (No. 124 to No. 130). Roberts turned 50 this year and splits time between the PGA TOUR and the Champions Tour while the 2003 British Open champion Curtis has exempt status through the 2008 season.

Four players climbed into the top 125 – Tag Ridings (No. 126 to No. 101), Hidemichi Tanaka (No. 149 to No. 115), Patrick Sheehan (No. 129 to 116) and Tommy Armour III (No. 132 to No. 123). Tanaka’s T3 finish matched his career best, a T3 at the 2004 B.C. Open.

Why The Focus On The Top Drivers?

Reader Greg asked why the great interest here in the jumps at the top of each Tour's driving distance stats.

On May 9, 2002, the USGA and R&A issued a "Joint Statement of Principles" regarding the improvement of golf clubs and balls. The key line says: "any further significant increases in hitting distances at the highest level are undesirable."

PGA TOUR:

  • 2002: 18 players averaged over 290 yards, 1 player averaged over 300 yards
  • 2005: 83 players averaging over 290 yards,  25 players averaging over 300 yards

Nationwide Tour:

  • 2002: 63 players averaged over 290 yards, 15 players averaged over 300 yards
  • 2005: 95 players averaged over 290 yards, 42 averaged players over 300 yards

So while the average Tour drive has climbed at a pace that the USGA could easily shrug off as not necessarily "significant," the huge leaps at the top would seem to indicate that manufacturers have been able to design a ball that passes the USGA overall distance standard under the stipulated launch conditions, but under different launch conditions, allows the players to exceed the distance standard. Thus, creating a situation where some are able to work around the intent of the rules.

Or the guys have just really been working out a lot since 2002.

But it doesn't matter how they've managed to increase their distance since the governing bodies say "any further significant increases in hitting distances at the highest level are undesirable."

Not much grey area in that statement, nor in the "highest level" driving distance increases since 2002.

Drive to a Billion Celebration

drive to a billion logo.jpgYou have to hand it to the PGA Tour folks who are organizing the "Drive to a Billion" celebration  on such short notice. After all, who'd a thought they would have reached the magical number by East Lake when it was originally believed this was going to happen next year?

Well, the celebration sounds touching:

A public celebration of the milestone is planned for Tuesday at East Lake Golf Club in Atlanta, Ga., in conjunction with the season-ending TOUR Championship. A giant cake will be cut and children from the East Lake Foundation -- representing the many charities that benefit from the money raised by PGA TOUR, Champions Tour and Nationwide Tour events - will be holding a host of colorful "Thanks a Billion" balloons. 

Pretty soon, these East Lake Foundation kids should be eligible for SAG cards after all of the photo ops they've had to do.

PGA/Nationwide Driving Distance Watch, Vol. 6

PGA Tour logo.jpgEven with soft conditions the last two weeks, the PGA Tour held steady at 25 players averaging over 300 yards off the tee, up from 14 last year. (If Ernie Els and Jason Gore had played enough rounds to be eligible, the number would be at 27 for 2005.)

nationwide logo.jpgThe conclusion of the Nationwide Tour season provides an opportunity to revisit their numbers. Again, a look at the leaders in driving distance average.

  • 2005: 95 players averaging over 290 yards, 42 averaging players over 300 yards

  • 200474 players averaging over 290 yards, 24 players averaging over 300 yards

  • 2002: 63 players averaging over 290 yards, 15 players averaging over 300 yards

  • 1998: 7 players averaging over 290 yards, 2 players averaging over 300 yards

Driven to a Billion

drive to a billion logo.jpgThe Tour will reached $1 billion in charitable donations thanks to the Charles Schwab Cup (Champions Tour event played this week in case you were wondering what that was).

This ought to silence all you cynics out there who thought it would magically happen at the Tour Championship.

Nope, it happened the Sunday night before...so they can milk it all week. Why didn't I think of that!

"It's pretty special," Tim Finchem said. "It's nice to celebrate a milestone like this. If more people and more companies really understand what's happening, that can help you grow. This is part of our mission. It's part of our culture."

Part of our culture? 

PGA Tour Driving Distance Watch Vol. 5

PGA Tour logo.jpgI was away and forgot to check the numbers. Those soggy fairways at Disney really took a toll on the Drive to 30 Over 300. The number of players averaging over 300 yards dropped from 26 to 25, yet another reminder how it's all about roll and has nothing to do with equipment.

30 averaging over 300 yards is going to be tough with only the Chrysler and Tour Championships left. These guys need to hit the weight room if we're going to do it: Charles Warren, Nick Watney, Dennis Paulson, Geoff Ogilvy, Robert Allenby and Michael Long. Come on guys!

Of course, after 18 weather delayed events, doubling the number over 300 this year isn't bad, especially since the line was drawn on this distance increase stuff in 2002.

Just our (third to last) friendly reminder: in 2004, 14 players averaged over 300 yards. 9 players averaged over 300 yards in 2003.  John Daly was the only player averaging over 300 yards for the 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 seasons.

Getting Down To (Tour) Business

SI's John Garrity profiles future PGA Tour policy board member Joe Ogilvie, who has established himself as an independent thinker (wait until he downs some of that special Ponte Punch  they serve up at Tour policy board meetings! He'll sound like Rick Fehr in no time.)

Ogilvie also pronounced the Tour "guilty" of bad communication and failure to stamp out rumors about its '07 schedule. "At the beginning of the year they handled it very poorly," Ogilvie said. "They talked to Tiger, Phil and Vijay," but not to the rank-and-file players, who were "pretty much spectators."

Showing a willingness to step on even the most talented toes, Ogilvie later addressed the rumor du jour on Tour -- that third-term Policy Board member Love will be awarded the contract to rework the TPC of Avenel in Potomac, Md., if tournament sponsor Booz Allen decides to return to the unpopular venue. "There's clearly a conflict of interest," Ogilvie said. "Davis probably wants the business, which is fair enough, but there's been a lot of discussion about it, and I think ultimately the Tour will give somebody else that contract." A Tour spokesman told SI that no contract has been awarded, and before one is, the matter will be the subject of full Policy Board discussion.

Golfweek's Forecaddie recently reported that the Avenel redo is pegged at $24 million. Amazing they know that without hiring an architect. And what a bargain!