American Turnout For Wentworth, Or Lack Thereof

From Doug Ferguson's notes column as the BMW Championship prepares to get underway at Wentworth. The World Top 50 plus past major winners are exempt. Only Shaun Micheel, Rich Beem and Ben Curtis are representing the Stars and Stripes.

Luke Donald wishes it would attract more Americans, though he understands the reasons not to play.

"You don't have to travel far to play in a $6 million event at a great course at Colonial," Donald said at Sawgrass. "But I've always been a proponent of to get the most out of your game, it's important to travel and to experience new places. I think at least go try it once, and if you don't like it, fair enough. But it's a big event on our tour. It's considered our Players Championship of the European Tour. And I would have thought that would incite some interest in some of the big Americans that would be exempt for it."

Finchem: Penalities, Schmenalties...Slow Play's Only A Problem For Everyday Game

I did an informal poll of players at The Players and asked what question they'd most like to have me ask Commissioner Tim Finchem during his 2012 Players "state of the tour" presser. Slow play on the tour won in a landslide and the Commissioner Denial didn't disappoint!

Let's go to the tape...

Q.  Top players like Luke Donald have said that they believe slow play is killing their sport, our sport.  Do you feel an urgency at all to address slow play, and do you feel the TOUR has an obligation to set an example for the game when it comes to pace of play?

COMMISSIONER FINCHEM:  You know, as long as I've been in the game, this has been a constant discussion.  There really isn't any difference.

No, just about an hour more tacked on to the round. That's all. Go on...

A lot of people look at the deliberate nature of the way we play the game at the TOUR level and relate that to when somebody says it's impacting the game negatively, they are referring to the amateur or average player making a determination whether they want to play golf if it takes me X long to play. 

Now if you look at my question, I tried to help the Commish by mentioning Luke Donald's name, but he didn't take the hint and I'm guessing he's not a big Twitter guy. So for the Commish: here are Luke's comments, most definitely not directed away from the tour, or, TOUR level.

After bellowing on about his preferences for fast play at the "club" level (he's sooo in touch with the everyday game he only mentioned club golf multiple times), Commissioner Fast Play got to the legitimate argument about field size...

When we put 156 people on the golf course, they are not going to play in four hours, typically.

Now, when we cut, on the weekend, and we go to, let's say we have got 70 and ties and we are at 74, then we are playing, what, if we play in twos, we are probably playing in 3:45.

These are the same guys that played on Thursday and Friday.  These are the same guys that are showing the same deliberation.  But when you put that many people on a golf course, that's just not going to happen.

On a Pro‑Am day when you play four amateurs and a professional and now you're five, you're playing a good Pro‑Am at 5 1/2.  We elect to continue to do that because we want that many people playing in the Pro‑Am, and it's kind of a different experience, anyway.

We are all ears to suggestions to help make the game of golf either faster, or funner; that's the way I refer to it.  Can we make it faster; can we make it funner?

Yes, make it faster! Keep the fields large.

And Jack Nicklaus addressed this at Augusta.  He said we architects‑‑ all of us in golf are to blame.  Architects are at the top of the list; we made the golf courses too difficult.  If it ain't much fun and it's slow to play, that's not what we're looking for.

Anything we can do from‑‑ we reach all of the fans.  Anything we can do from a communications standpoint to encourage people playing faster, we will do.  But clubs have got to take the initiative to drive play, and the average player has got to take the initiative and say, guys, let's go out here and play in three hours and 45 minutes, and that doesn't happen too many places.

So if I'm watching‑‑ I'm giving you a long answer, but I've been talking about this for a long time.  If I'm watching a PGA TOUR player, and I'm going to go through the same pre‑shot routine that that player takes, and he's hitting it 69 times and I'm hitting it 93, I'm going to be playing a lot longer than that guy.  So it's a different game from that perspective.

Again, this is not a PGA Tour problem. Well, kind of since it's their routines setting a bad example. So...which is it Tim?

And if you notice our players, they move; they don't want to be on the clock. 

Except Webb. And Ben. And Zach. And...

They hit a shot and they move.  But there are different variables out here at this level and we measure it pretty carefully.

One thing we are sensitive to is a player who is slow and as such impacts his fellow competitor, which is a different thing from how long it takes to play.  That results in some counseling, and we have had good success with counseling.

Counseling!

But I don't think PGA TOUR golf is the culprit here.  I think the culprit is taking steps to drive the pace of play for the average player, and if we can be helpful in that regard, we're open to it.

Q.  The USGA has a pace of play system they have implemented in all their championships except the U.S. Open, and they feel they need the TOUR to implement a similar system with penalty shotsfor them to be able to introduce it to the U.S. Open.

COMMISSIONER FINCHEM:  I actually think we might want to experiment with penalty shots.  But I don't think penalty shots make a difference to be honest with you.

Experiment with them? Pssssst Tim. You have slow play rules you don't enforce. Are you saying you don't believe in the rules in place? Not a big rules guy these days?

Conceptually it makes sense.  If you're going to put a couple of shots on a guy, it's going to make him play faster.  But that's not the culprit.  The slow player, even though we have some slow players, is the system that's creating what you're seeing on television.

In today's world, we go to a golf course like we just left in California, Poppy Hills, and you've got like three drivable 5s and a drivable 4, and with a full field in our tournament, you're going to back up. 

I'm sorry, Poppy Hills? Last played in 2010? That Poppy Hills? Go on...

People are going to wait.  That's just the way it is.  The only way, we have to have smaller fields.

Now, you have players on our TOUR who would say, yes, we do; let's have them.  Let's put 130 players out there, 122 players.  At Augusta, they get nervous if you are going over a hundred players.  And let's have a good pace of play.

We elect not to do that, because as much as we like to see a stronger pace of play, the playing opportunities for the number of players we have had are more important, and we'll generate the playing opportunities first and take our lumps second.  It's as simple as that.

At least he was honest in that last part. It's as simple as that.

More Q-School Demise Fallout: Walker Cup Captain Scouring Junior Ranks For Possible Players

I think Scott Michaux was a bit stunned to find 2013 Walker Cup Captain Jim Holtgrieve scouting players at the Junior Invitational at Sage Valley, now in its second year of glorious excess. Holtgrieve confirms he is hitting the junior golf trail in anticipation of Q-School's demise causing top players to turn pro long before the Walker Cup at The National Golf Links.

“I’m going to be a little more cognizant about junior play because I think that’s probably where it’s going to go,” Holtgrieve said of the Walker Cup selection process. That’s a safe bet considering 2011 Sage Valley runner-up Patrick Rodgers made Holtgrieve’s 10-man roster last fall.

“Last year having Patrick Rodgers on the team was eye-opening,” said George Cunningham, 15, of Tucson, Ariz., who played in his second Junior Invitational.

Because of the pending changes to Q-School, Holtgrieve has received every indication that top American collegians Patrick Cantlay and Jordan Spieth will pass up hanging around as amateurs another year in order to participate in the final Q-School that hands out PGA Tour cards. Cantlay and Spieth were Holtgrieve’s top point-getters with 2.5 each in last year’s Walker Cup at Royal Aberdeen, and they would have been the expected leaders for next year’s campaign to win back the cup.

“Nobody is a lock, but there’s no doubt about it that both of them are great players and great ambassadors for the United States,” Holtgrieve said. “So selfishly I’m hoping they stay amateur and try to make the team again.”

Realistically, he knows that won’t happen. Because Holtgrieve understands that amateur and collegiate golf are all the unintended victims of the death of Q-School.

“Absolutely,” he said when the trickle-down consequence of Q-School’s demise was broached.

By the way, if you get weepy seeing the yellow jacket ceremony at the Junior Invitational presented by Electrolux, or nauseous at the sight of 16 year olds with caddies in white overalls, don't watch the final round highlights produced by PGA Tour Productions. They also had W on hand for the banquet.

Four Greens at TPC San Antonio To Be Rebuilt

Golf World Monday's Ron Sirak notes the Valero Texas Open's inability to draw a field and the TPC San Antonio's AT&T Oaks Course, which was 50th of 53 in the Golf World player survey, appears to be the problem. He reports that four greens will be rebuilt and the unplayable lies just out of play will need to be addressed.

When Greg Norman and Pete Dye were selected to design the 36 holes at San Antonio, a policy board member famously suggested budgeting for the inevitable post-opening redo. Wonder if the Commissioner listened? Wait, what was I thinking. I'm sorry for wasting that last 15 seconds of your time.