Golf World Redesign Chatter
/Golf World's Geoff Russell responds to reader complaints about eliminating the scores and stats for more New Yorker style commentary from hacks like me. Any subscribers here care to weigh in?
When you come to think of it that is the secret of most of the great holes all over the world. They all have some kind of a twist. C.B. MACDONALD
Golf World's Geoff Russell responds to reader complaints about eliminating the scores and stats for more New Yorker style commentary from hacks like me. Any subscribers here care to weigh in?
For all of the talk about the average golfer aspirational golfer wanting to play the same equipment as the professional, we always assume the pros are getting stuff that's fine tuned compared to what's on the shelves of Roger Dunn. As Michael Bamberger demonstrates in this look at feel players, with a focus on Bubba Watson, it's not just the manufacturers who can refine equipment to the tightest specs. Elite players demand differently than most of us. For Immediate Job-Saving Support In The Wake Of A Corporate Merger...
Golf Channel Celebrates Best January Ever
Thanks to reader Kevin for this On Point post about golfer James Wiencek suing Ocean Creek Golf Club for creating an "artificial habitat" that allowed a 10-pound alligator to bite off Wiencek's arm.
Golf Digest features their "risk takers" of golf and yes, in a moment of synergistic harmony that will have you muttering conspiracy theories, includes yours truly. If it's any consolation, when Ron Whitten called to interview me he had no idea about a possible partnership between my site and GolfDigest.com.
Thanks to reader Tim for sending the link.
Lorne Rubenstein doesn't sound too enthused about Mark King's suggestion to re-write the rules of golf and offers his own sarcastic rebuttal that sounds eerily similar to the serious proposal from the Flogton folks.
Thanks to reader John for a long overdue link to a Rubenstein column!
Amateurs who cannot prove they can carry the ball 175 yards should be forced to play courses no longer than 5,000 yards. All amateurs should be allowed to carry as many clubs as they want. If they want to drive a cart alone with two bags full of clubs, the rules should enable that. Just think what that would do for the equipment industry.
The amateur golfer should be allowed 10 do-overs a round. Moreover, the amateur who does not break 100 at least once every 10 rounds should be allowed to try every shot twice. Why should golf be so onerous, when even a pro baseball player gets three strikes before he’s outta there.
Then there’s sand. Amateurs hate sand, even with 60-degree wedges, a club that helps Phil Mickelson, not Phil Flail. An amateur should be allowed three toss-outs a round. The rules must allow no more than one shot in a bunker. Should the golfer not get out on the first try, the rules must compel a throw toward the hole. Underhand, sidearm or overhand would be allowed.
Meanwhile, consider the dimensions of the hole. There’s no reason, other than hundreds of years of history, that the hole should be so small. Double the size, at least. Make it square. Greenkeepers should also cut two holes on half of the greens, especially in club competitions. The golfer could play to the one nearest the place the ball finishes.
Slugger White doesn't sound too optimistic about much golf being played, according to this unbylined Arizona Republic story.
Somehow I just picture Open Doctor Rees Jones turning into Harvey Korman in Blazing Saddles when he goes to Charleston National for a check up. It's Rees, not Reese!
Geoff Shackelford is a Senior Writer for Golfweek magazine, a weekly contributor to Golf Channel's Morning
Copyright © 2022, Geoff Shackelford. All rights reserved.