On the post of John Huggan's annual chat with R&A secretary Peter Dawson, reader John G posted something that I think needs further consideration since I glossed over it in the inital posting:
"We now see balls spinning more from 2in or 3in rough than they do when hit from the fairway."
I'm sorry, this quote just doesn't pass the smell test. I can't believe Huggan didn't pounce on this. Has anyone seen any research to confirm this kind of statement?
I would believe that spin rates from 2-3" rough could be similar, but not quite as good as from a normal fairway lie.
But BETTER spin rates from rough than from a nice tightly mown fairway?? C'mon. I'm not THAT gullible.
These guys are desperate to say anything to distract from the real issues.
So do you think the USGA/R&A will actually be able to prove that this has been the case (better spin rates from rough than fairway), and if so, does anyone buy it?