And You Think Your City Is A Mess...

There's always San Diego to show you what bureacratic absurdity is really like. Tod Leonard writes in the San Diego Union Tribune:

For the second time in 15 days, City Councilwoman Donna Frye has put the brakes on talks regarding changes to the Torrey Pines golf courses.

After learning that the city's golf operations department was planning to go to the City Council on Monday and ask for approval to soon begin moving the North Course's 18th green to make room for a new clubhouse that has yet to be approved, Frye took action. She contacted Deputy City Manager Ellen Oppenheim, who agreed to attach a memo to the item with the understanding that no work would be done on the North until a clubhouse project is approved.

Finding Strath

Mike Clayton writes in The Age about Melbourne golfer Noel Terry and his discovery of David Strath's grave in Australia, solving one of golfs great mysteries.

Strath's golfing story is an interesting one. He was the rival and friend of the greatest player of the time, Young Tom Morris, who won the Open Championship four times in a row from 1868 to 1872 (there was no championship in 1871). The pair toured Scotland and as far south as Liverpool in England playing exhibition matches, sometimes in front of 10,000 people.

They were the superstars of their time and are credited with popularising the game. Strath was runner-up to Morris in the Open Championships of 1870 and 1872 and in 1876 he tied for the championship at St Andrews but refused to play off because of a rules dispute.

That Open was a shambles as someone had forgotten to book the golf course and players were competing amongst the regular public players. Strath's long approach to the 17th green had hit a spectator on the green and there were protests that he had somehow gained an advantage. He was asked to play off for the title with the undertaking that the question would be settled when an official was available to adjudicate.

Strath refused, reasoning there was little point if he was going to have the crown taken away in the following days.

"Settle it now or I won't be here in the morning" was his not-unreasonable request.

Week In Review, Jan 22-28: USGA Jet Use

WeekInReview2.jpgThe week kicked off with the first exclusive to this site and ended with a pair of notable contributions.

Scrutinized was the USGA's use of private jet travel for its president (and controlled by the sitting president). The first follow up looked at the cost based on published estimates, another highlighted the comments of USGA Executive Director David Fay, while we wrapped up the quest for details with a firm no from USGA spokesman Marty Parkes.

More interesting than my musings were reader comments, which are viewable here and here, and which would seem to indicate that the USGA has an image problem.

Former USGA Executive Director Frank Hannigan wrote to this site and raised many issues that will be analyzed next week (I know, you can't wait).

In other news, David Davies joined the technophobic agenda crowd while Chris Lewis looked at the future of the game and wasn't wild about what he saw.

Bill Kratzert talked to Garry Smits about the repercussions of the Tour TV deal and its 2007 departure from ESPN.

Again, reader comments were very interesting on Taylor Made's use of michellewiegolf.com. Thanks again to reader Tuco for the heads up, and to all of the readers who helped out this week. I couldn't do it without your help.

My latest Golfdom column arrived just in time for the PGA Show. The hate mail has slowed...for now.

Tiger Woods talked about the changes to Augusta National and offered some wisdom about setting up the course when its wet.

And finally, there were so many great comments this week on various posts (thanks for the contributions, please keep it up), but I'd hate to not recognize the input of touring professional Sean Murphy.  He commented on Jeff Rude's story, where Murphy was mentioned (and constructively criticized).

Letter From Saugerties

From the former Executive Director of the USGA: 

Dear Geoff:  

I applaud your exposure of USGA JetGate.    

Don’t stop.   A revolt, with blood in the streets, is needed.  If you can’t become the Danton of that upsurge you could at least play Woodward and Bernstein.     
 
Flying members of the USGA Executive Committee hither and yon in leased jets, while it may so far have cost what you estimate to be  $340,000, is not about the money.  To that institution, whose investments have a street value of  about $300 million, leasing a jet equates to tip money.

What matters is the change in motivation for those aspiring to reach high office in the USGA. In our society there are two things that get many people of wealth off. One is appearing on television. The other is private jets. Having forced NBC to put them on television during USGA championships years earlier, they have now gone 2 for 2.

As far as I know, it is not above the law for entities labeled 501c3 for tax purposes to have their officers soar in the wild blue yonder on leased jets, but it’s something some people might want to think about when asked to contribute to the USGA members program. Signing on, of course, makes them a member of nothing.

The USGA says that JetGate is entirely open and above board. They point to an audit committee to approve jet travel – the audit committee consisting of themselves. Apparently it was nothing but an oversight that the signing of a lease for private jets was not put up on the USGA web site.  The answer to who has flown where is, “it’s none of your business.”

The argument posed for private jets seems to be there are new and terrible demands for the time of Executive Committee members, coupled with the USGA’s proclivity for scheduling events in citadels of the remote, e.g., Prairie Dunes in Hutchison, Kansas.

I’m afraid what it boils down to, besides the hubris, is that it was too much to ask outgoing president Fred Ridley, who lives in Tampa, to change planes in Chicago.

USGA officers travel more and spend more nights away from home because they get a kick out of it.  It makes them feel good.  Playing USGA is a delightful contrast with the dreary things they have to do to make a living.

As for travel time, I recall that the most important and successful USGA president in history was Richard S. Tufts,  who ran Pinehurst.  How long do you think it took Dick Tufts to get from Pinehurst to Union Station in Los Angeles by train prior to a US Open at Riviera?     Three and a half days, that’s how long. Then he had to get back too.

Wait. The USGA says there is also a hue and a cry for its officers, especially its president, to speak at dinners. Never mind that Fred Ridley is neither Daniel Webster nor Barack Obama. The demand for his presence and words, they say, exists.

Here’s what the USGA should do.  Like their brethren of the R&A  in Scotland they should create the position of  Captain, a person with no power who is garbed in a red jacket and goes about  making speeches. Nobody would object if the Captain’s expenses were paid.  The Captain might even go out with an iPod secreted in his sternum which would bleat out phrases like “We love this game”, “the ball does NOT go too far,” and “Michelle Wie most certainly was an amateur golfer.”

Ridley and Walter Driver, who will succeed Ridley at the USGA annual meeting on Feb. 4, have been the dominant USGA figures of the last l0 years.  If Queen Elizabeth was doing analysis for The Golf Channel she most term it the USGAs “decadus horriblus.”   The failure to regulate equipment ranks highest among the failures, but it is not isolated.

Look, an entity like the USGA definitely needs a governing board, but one that is focused on matters of grand policy, not on hole locations for the US Open. The most important thing the USGA executive committee does, by miles, is to name an executive director, the head of staff.  Absurdly, they try to function under the myth that the president is “the chief executive officer.”

There are 3 meetings of the Executive Committee per year.  They run a couple of days. In truth, to serve on an the executive committee requires only a showing up at those meetings IF the member reads what is sent to him and is capable of using a phone and E Mail. They are not needed at US Opens. If not one of them showed up at Winged Foot next June no one would notice the difference.

Sadly, they have become more surreptitious. It used to be true that changes in the by-laws were presented in writing for approval by the member clubs. That provision was struck down not long ago so that the committee itself could change the by-laws without dvising the membership in advance.

Soon they liberalized the expense compensation policy for themselves and then upped the ante in 2004 to jets.

When I pointed out in public that there was a by-law provision whereby any five USGA clubs could run a rump slate against the establishment slate they jumped the number to 20.
 
The senior staff knows better. Some of them cringe. But to cry out could mean that their kids might not be able to go to four year
colleges.

I got a big kick out of executive director David Fay’s explanation to you of why the jets are needed.  He mused about the time away from home issue and then allowed as how, who knows, there could be a president who would come along and change all that.

Geoff, my man, that’s what is known as wishful thinking.

Cordially,

Frank Hannigan

It's All About the Fitness

Damon Hack writes about Bubba Watson:

A confluence of fitness, equipment and old-fashioned swing speed have rendered the PGA Tour a slamfest in recent years, and Watson is at the forefront of that push — at least in swing speed.

"My dad gave me a 9-iron at age 6 and said, 'Hit it as hard as you can,' " said Watson, who weighs 180 pounds. "It's about hitting the ball in the center of the club face and hitting it hard.

"If it ever comes down to where I need a lesson, I'm retiring," Watson added. "People say, 'Quiet your hips, do your elbow.' I don't have a clue what that means. I just hit it."

As for hitting the gym?

"I just like to sleep," he said. "I think Tiger and his caddie went out running yesterday, and I was like, 'You won't see me doing that, and my caddie won't be running, either.'

"My wife has tried a few times to get me to work out, and she yells at me about that, but I don't see myself doing that," Watson added. "There will be no yoga, you won't see me lift up any weights over 100 pounds."

Okay then, it's the "agronomy." In Bubba's case.

USGA Private Jet Travel, Vol. 4

Regarding the USGA's private jet program and trying to understand the rationale for specific trips taken, the USGA's Marty Parkes says that information given to me by David Fay and posted here, "is what we're prepared to share." 

Parkes says there are "several valid reasons why such confidentially is warranted," though he did not elaborate on what those reasons are.

What is so sensitive about a trip similar to the Kennebunkport First Tee meeting that was cited? Or some rubber chicken golf association dinners?

And why would those require confidentiality when the USGA Audit Committee has evaluated and cleared them as acceptable?

Tiger 2000 v. 2005

George White compares 2000 Tiger to last year's edition.

OK, let’s go to a stat which is fairly meaningless when you are bombing drives out there that distance. Let’s compare driving accuracy. He hit 71.2 percent of his fairways in 2000. And last year he hit – just 54.6? His ranking last year was 188th, while in 2000 he was 54th.

OK, fair enough, but the fairways-hit figure is fairly inconsequential when one is hitting wedges and 9-irons into virtually every par-4 green. So let’s compare greens hit. In 2005 he hit 70 percent, good for sixth on tour. And in 2000 he hit – a little better than 75 percent, which was first on tour.

This has probably been covered before on this web site, or maybe it was just something I obsessed over in a book proposal that was met by some of the most hilarious rejection excuses of all time. Anyway, his fairway hit percentage drops nearly 17% in 2005 and his green in regulation number only drops 5%.

Flogging man, it works!

White also writes:

Now, let me tell you what is wrong with all this analysis: golf courses have gotten longer and tighter than in 2000; and equipment has changed dramatically. Not to mention that the men who are playing this year – heck, the men who were playing LAST year – are much different from 2000. Are they a better group than 2000? Undoubtedly they are. Golf in 2006 is not the same game as Golf 2000. 

At the pace we're on, imagine how much different golf in 2012 will be than golf 2006?

Bunker Bits

gw-logo.gifLots of fun stuff in this week's Golf World "Bunker."

John Strege catches up with Mac O'Grady, with wacky Mac offering offers his thoughts on the Champions Tour, caddying and his forthcoming novel, which ought to see a printing press about the time his swing book and tape series hits the market. Wait, it can't be a book and tape series anymore. Book and DVD. 

Stu Schneider opens with his usual first rate one-liner and follows with analysis of Nick Faldo's "open bar" bit, which I passed on in favor of UCLA-West Virginia. Sounds like I didn't miss much.

Page one of the Bunker wonders whether the 2007 schedule is really set in stone. Bob Combs says yes, a few cranky tournament directors and Westchester CC do not agree.

Tiger Press Conference at Torrey Pines

The assembled inkslingers got plenty of time with Tiger Woods before the Buick, yielding a few interesting comments in spite of the questions.

Q. (Inaudible).

TIGER WOODS: You never know. I haven't started designing yet. No one has presented me any opportunities yet as far as that, but maybe one day."

tx_tigerbuick.jpgI'm guessing he was asked about designing a course? If so, it's hard to believe no one has presented an opportunity.

Q. What are your latest thoughts about the lengthening of Augusta almost in the context of what you just said? And do you think it's going to be a better test of skill that's going to require a better player to win now?

TIGER WOODS: The only way I think it would be a better test is if it remained dry because then every player can hit a good drive and have a reasonable iron to the green.

But if it's soaked I hit driver and a 3-iron to 11 one year when it was wet, and all the guys that were in front of me and in my group and behind me were all hitting lumber in there. That hole is not meant to hit 3-wood or 5-wood or something into that green.

Same thing with No. 7. That hole was not designed for a 5-iron. If it was, it was not at that green speed.

If the fairways are firm and they're running, then I can see it being a great test. But if they're soft, then I think it eliminates a lot of guys that have the skill to play but they just don't hit the ball far enough.

Q. (Inaudible).

TIGER WOODS: I think you need to move it around, depending on the conditions. If it's soft, why play a 500 plus par 4 all the way back when it's soft? Give the guys a chance a little bit. But now give the guys a chance a little bit and make it 480 (laughing). I think the staff needs to understand moving around. The prerequisite now is almost you have to hit the ball long. Length has always been an advantage in this sport, always has been and always will be. You just need to make it fair for all the rest of the competitors, as well.    

USGA Private Jet Travel, Vol. 3

USGA Executive Director David Fay kindly returned my call (from the PGA Show in Orlando) to follow up on the USGA's enrollment in a private jet travel program and the committee's private aircraft policy that was first reported here.

Regarding the issue of Executive Committee purchasing 100 hours of flight time at a cost of at least $340,000, he responds: 

I don’t see the issue. Compared to when I started when the likes of [Sandy] Tatum or [Harry] Easterly were president, the role of president has been expanded rather dramatically in terms of the amount of time that he or she has to spend. “Has to” might not be the right phrase for that. You’re talking about [a situation] somewhat like the PGA of America officers in terms of the amount of days on the road.

As for the reasons one might need to use the jet:

If a club is interested in a US Amateur or a US Open or Senior Open, perhaps they want to have the chairman of the championship committee go. Sometimes these places are not exactly on the beaten path.

As an example take last year, because I was just in meetings with Mr. Finchem on equipment, and he wanted to meet in Far Hills. The night before, Fred Ridley, Peter Dawson and myself were in Toronto for the RCGA centennial dinner for the Canadian Open. The dinner ends late. The only way you could get back. First of all, we wouldn’t have been able to have that meeting if that plane wasn’t available. So the three of us got on the plane and got into Morristown airport at something like quarter to twelve at night, got to the hotel, and we were able to start the meeting the next morning at 8. Those are the types of trips. I could give you some examples of the trips. I can’t come up with all of them because I don’t know what they all were.

Does it ease the travel? Sure. Does it make it easier for the president to say, "yes I’ll go to speak at the American Society of Golf Course Architects annual meeting." They’ll say fine, because I think if you didn’t have that it would be easier, particularly when they have a day job, to pass on that. Particularly in this post 9-11 era, it’s just a pain to get from point A to point B. Particularly if you are living in an area where maybe it’s not a hub.

As for the accountability issue and in particular the idea of the Audit Committee reporting to the president (who controls access to the jet):

Not just the president's expenses, the full committees’, are reviewed by everyone on that committee. You could say well, now it’s just the committee reviewing their own, but since you aren’t getting any stock options for being on the Executive Committee, there are independent thinkers and if they saw something that was suspicious, they would flag it.

Examples of trips that Mr. Fay could recall:

[Ridley] went to a First Tee oversight meeting in Kennebunkport, Maine. That’s probably a good one to use the plane on. I think Hutchinson. Never Bandon, Oregon. Because realistically you would have to stop a couple of times anyway. I don’t know what the type of jet it is, but I don’t believe it’s one that you could go from the west to the east coast without refueling.

Mr. Fay clarified that if the plane has to make stops for refueling, then the time saved is usually minimal and the cost was likely too prohibitive to okay a trip.

There was an issue with Paul Caruso, who is one of my favorites. There was a bank issue. He’s a banker. He had to be there for it. He made an inquiry into whether he could use the plane. The answer was yes, you can. In this case he wasn't going to save any time by using it because he'd have to make stops.

And regarding the question of "need" and the role of the USGA president in today's game, Fay had this to say.

It’s a more active role. Not to compare it to the old days, but the number of days that a Sandy Tatum or a Will Nicholson or a Jim Hand or a Bill Campbell or Bill Williams spend on the road paled compared to a Ridley, or MacKenzie or Bell or Holland and maybe Driver now. You never know. There may be a day that a USGA President that says no to all of this.

Mr. Fay kindly offered to provide more (but not all) examples of the trips taken and what USGA business they involved.

Equipment Rules: Totally Optional

Rick Arnett on SI.com:

...I'm displaying my birthday golf wish for all to see --especially to those conservative officials at the USGA and Royal & Ancient who rule over how the game is played.

My desire is for the official honchos to forgo all equipment limitations. No size regulations on drivers or groove depth of irons or ball-distance confines next year. No restrictions on shoe spike patterns, rangefinder use, grip or special alignment considerations. Let the golf equipment designers go nuts and think way outside the box.

Hate to be the bearer of tedious tidings here, but the golf equipment manufacturers may do whatever they want.

Following the equipment rules of the USGA and R&A is completely, 100% optional.   They are free to sell as many "non-conforming" clubs and balls as they'd like.

No one in Far Hills or St. Andrews is stopping them from doing that.